Trs .of Amherst Coll. v. Ritch
Decision Date | 19 January 1897 |
Citation | 45 N.E. 876,151 N.Y. 282 |
Parties | TRUSTEES OF AMHERST COLLEGE et al. v. RITCH et al. |
Court | New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals |
Appeal from supreme court, general term, First department.
Action by the trustees of Amherst College and others against Thomas G. Ritch and others, to establish and enforce a secret trust for the benefit of plaintiffs under the will of Daniel B. Fayerweather, deceased, of which defendants Thomas G. Ritch, Justus L. Bulkley, and Henry B. Vaughan were executors, etc. The other defendants were testator's next of kin, and the executors of the estate of Lucy Fayerweather, deceased, widow of the testator, and certain literary and charitable corporations which claimed under such secret trust and a deed of gift by Thomas G. Ritch and others, as executors, trustees, and residuary legatees. From a judgment of the general term (36 N. Y. Supp. 576) affirming a judgment of the special term (31 N. Y. Supp. 885) in favor of plaintiffs, defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Deniel B. Fayerweather, an old resident of the city of New York, died on the 15th of November, 1890, leaving a will, four codicils, an estate of several millions, consisting chiefly of personal property, and debts amounting to less than $10,000. He left neither child nor descendant, but a widow and three nieces, his only heirs at law and next of kin, survived him. By the first and second articles of his will, which is dated October 6, 1884, he revoked all prior wills by him made and provided for the payment of his debts, funeral expenses, and the costs and charges attending the administration of his estate. By the third article he bequeathed to his wife the sum of $10,000, and by the fourth he devised to her his dwelling house and the furniture therein, his stable, horses, carriages, and the like. By the fifth article he gave his wife an annuity of $15,000 during her life, and directed that the provisions in his will for her benefit should be in lieu of dower or other interest in his estate. By the sixth article he gave to Anna Amelia Joyce an annuity of $1,000 during her life, or so long as she should remain unmarried; and by the seventh he gave to Lucy J. Beardsley $100,000, to Mary W. Achter and Emma S. Drury $10,000 each, and to Charles Hennessey, a porter in his store, $1,000. The eighth, ninth, and tenth articles are as follows: By the eleventh and last article he appointed Justus L. Bulkley and Thomas G. Ritch executors of his will and trustees of his estate, with authority to sell and convey, and to do any and all acts in their discretion expedient or necessary to the full execution of the provisions of his will.
Anna Amelia Joyce, who is named in the sixth article, was a sister of Mrs Fayerweather, and lived in the family of the testator, for whom she occasionally acted as an amanuensis. She subsequently married, and is now Mrs. John B. Reynolds. Lucy J. Beardsley, Mary W. Achter, and Emma S. Drury, mentioned in the seventh article, are the heirs at law and next of kin of the testator. Mrs. Drury, having obtained a divorce, resumed her maiden name, and is now known as Emma S. Fayerweather. The property given to the widow by the fourth clause of the will was worth about $100,000. In early life Mr. Fayerweather spent some time in the neighborhood of the University of Virginia, and his experience and associations at that time awakened an interest in college education. His instructions to Mr. Thomas G. Ritch, his legal advisor, who drew this will, were that he wished to dispose of his property in the same general way as in previous wills made by him. In 1875 he executed a will, the contents of which were not disclosed by the evidence, except that it showed an interest in educational institutions. This interest appeared more plainly in a will made in 1880, by which he gave $1,600,000 to 14 colleges, including 12 of those named in the ningh article of the will that is now the subject of controversy. The residuary clause of the will of 1880 was substantially like the tenth article of his last will, made in 1884, except that the beneficiaries were the same 14 colleges to which he had given specific legacies to the amount of $1,600,000, as aforesaid.
On the same day that the will in question was executed, the testator signed a paper of even date, the body of which is as follows: Both the will and this paper were prepared under the direction of Mr. Ritch, and were given to him for safe-keeping as soon as they were executed. The only statutes of this state imposing restrictions upon the disposition of property that are applicable to this will are chapter 319 of the Laws of 1848, as amended, which relates to the amount of property that benevolent corporations can receive by devise, and chapter 360 of the Laws of 1860, which forbids a testator, having a wife, child, or parent, to give more than one half of his estate to charitable, benevolent, or literary institutions. The bequests to the 5 hospitals named in the eighth clause amount to $95,000, while those to the 20 colleges named in the ninth clause amount to $2,100,000, so that, under the operation of the statute last named, the tenth clause of the will was valid only to the extent of the difference between $2,195,000 and one-half of the estate remaining after the payment of debts.
About two months after he made his will, Mr. Fayerweather executed his first codicil, dated December 13, 1884, the disposing part of which is in these words: Mr. Ritch, who prepared this codicil, also prepared a paper, which was substantially copied by the testator and signed by him, bearing the date of December 11, 1884, and headed ‘Private Memorandum,’ of which the following is a copy: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Atwood v. Rhode Island Hospital Trust Co., 1479.
......(N.S.) 400; Haskell v. Staples, . 116 Me. 103, 100 A. 148, L.R.A. 1917D, 819; Amherst. College v. Ritch, 151 N.Y. 282, 332, 45 N.E. 876, 37. L.R.A. 305; Reynolds v. Reynolds, 224 ......
-
Leibowits v. Leibowits
...v. Davis, 198 N.Y. 261, 91 N.E. 582; Newton v. Porter, 69 N.Y. 133 [wrongful use of another's property], with Trustees of Amherst Coll. v. Ritch, 151 N.Y. 282, 45 N.E. 876 [conveyance by will on oral trust], and Ellerson v. Westcott, 148 N.Y. 149, 42 N.E. 540 [acquisition by homicide] ). Fi......
-
Barron v. Stuart
...... Gaither, 3 Md.Ch. 158; Williams v. Vreeland, 32 N.J.Eq. 734;. Trustees of Amherst College v. Ritch, 151. N.Y. 282, 37 L.R.A. 305; Gilpatrick v. Glidden (Me.), 81 Me. 137, 2 ......
-
Torgerson v. Hauge
......Parsons, 155 N.Y. 555, 50 N.E. 265; Bower v. Daniel, 198 Mo. 289, 95 S.W. 347;. Amherst College v. Ritch, 151 N.Y. 282, 37 L.R.A. 305, 45 N.E. 876; Ahrens v. Jones, 169 N.Y. 555, 88. ......