Truitt v. State, 55818

Decision Date15 June 1978
Docket NumberNo. 55818,55818
Citation146 Ga.App. 231,246 S.E.2d 141
PartiesTRUITT v. The STATE.
CourtGeorgia Court of Appeals

Leonard M. Tuggle, Martinez, for appellant.

Johnny E. Truitt, pro se.

Richard E. Allen, Dist. Atty., Steven L. Beard, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee.

BELL, Chief Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction of two counts of armed robbery. Held :

The district attorney on cross examination asked the defendant, "Isn't it true that you are being held on a crime so vicious that perjury would be pale beside it?" Immediately thereafter, the court sua sponte reprimanded the prosecutor and instructed the jury to disregard the question. Defendant neither objected nor made any motion at that time. On appeal, defendant asserts for the first time that the court should have declared a mistrial. As defendant failed to object at trial, any alleged error was waived. Smith v. State, 142 Ga.App. 406, 236 S.E.2d 107. Further, the trial judge took the necessary purgative action by means of a thorough instruction to the jury and rebuke to the prosecutor. Thus the improper question was cured by the court's corrective action. Benefield v. State, 140 Ga.App. 727, 232 S.E.2d 89.

Judgment affirmed.

SHULMAN and BIRDSONG, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Truitt v. Jones
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of Georgia
    • June 11, 1985
    ...two concurrent terms of twenty years incarceration.1 The Georgia Court of Appeals affirmed petitioner's conviction. Truitt v. State, 146 Ga.App. 231, 246 S.E.2d 141 (1978). Petitioner then filed in the Superior Court of Walker County, Georgia, a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After h......
  • Prater v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • April 3, 1979
    ...the trial court's immediate cautionary instructions cured any error and obviated any need for a mistrial. E. g., Truitt v. State, 146 Ga.App. 231, 246 S.E.2d 141 (1978). 4. The charge. "Failure to charge in the exact language requested, where the charge given substantially covered the same ......
  • Lynn v. Miller Lumber Co., 55766
    • United States
    • Georgia Court of Appeals
    • June 15, 1978

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT