Trzepacz v. State
| Decision Date | 18 October 1999 |
| Docket Number | No. A99A1972.,A99A1972. |
| Citation | 523 S.E.2d 599,240 Ga. App. 410 |
| Parties | TRZEPACZ v. The STATE. |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
John B. Cloy, Brunswick, for appellant.
Christopher J. Osteen, Solicitor, for appellee.
A McIntosh State Court jury found Eugene Trzepacz guilty of misdemeanor assault for throwing a large, wooden board at his neighbor. He appeals his conviction. We affirm.
1. Trzepacz challenges the sufficiency of the evidence introduced against him. Viewed in a light most favorable to support the verdict, the evidence shows that Trzepacz and his neighbor, Janice Horn, had a dispute as to the location of the line between their respective properties. Apparently, Horn maintained a flower garden on the line, which garden was surrounded by landscape timber referred to during trial as "border boards." On the evening at issue, Horn discovered that a border board had been removed from the perimeter of her garden. She was putting it back into place when appellant Trzepacz approached. Horn testified that "[h]e was like in a rage and I don't know exactly what he said but he was hollering that it was on his property and that it wasn't on my property." Trzepacz pulled the border board out of the ground and threw it at Horn, who was forced to step back in order to avoid being hit. Afraid that Trzepacz would try to hurt her again, Horn went inside her house. Thereafter, she swore out a warrant for Trzepacz's arrest for simple assault.
An appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine the credibility of witnesses, but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Grier v. State, 218 Ga.App. 637, 638, 463 S.E.2d 130 (1995). As long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, on each element necessary to prove the State's case, the jury's verdict will be upheld. Id. Here, Horn's testimony was sufficient as a matter of law to establish the elements of the offense of simple assault. OCGA § 16-5-20. The jury believed Horn's version of events and found Trzepacz guilty on the basis thereof. Accordingly, the evidence was sufficient. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979).
2. Trzepacz contends that the trial court improperly restricted his right to cross-examine the victim, Janice Horn. However, our review of the record shows that the trial court did not make any ruling at all during defense counsel's cross-examination of Horn, let alone a restrictive one.
The record does reveal, however, that—following Horn's cross-examination and outside the presence of the jury—the trial court properly admonished defense counsel for taking it upon himself to throw a border board onto the floor during Horn's cross:
Contrary to appellant's assertions, defense counsel's throwing of a board to the courtroom floor demonstrated nothing about what occurred between the parties during the incident in question and certainly illustrated nothing about the testimony of Janice Horn. Thus, the trial court properly instructed the jury to disregard defense counsel's personal...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
In re Interest of T. P.
...angrily throwing a wooden board at the victim, causing the victim to step back in order to avoid being hit, Trzepacz v. State , 240 Ga. App. 410, 410-411 (1), 523 S.E.2d 599 (1999) ; a defendant breaking into a victim's home, advancing upon her with a steel pipe, and causing the victim to f......
-
MORETON ROLLESTON LIVING TRUST v. GLYNN COUNTY BD.
... ... App. 406] approved by the State Revenue Commissioner pursuant to OCGA § 48-5-304(a) ... OCGA § 48-5-311(e)(6)(A) and (B) provide that, within 15 days of receipt ... ...
-
Sexton v. Ga. Dep't of Corr.
...Den. Mot. J.Pleadings 13, Abercrombie v. Beam, No. 1:15-CV-4452 (N.D. Ga. June 9, 2016), ECF No. 15); see also Trzepacz v. State, 523 S.E.2d 599, 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999) (affirming conviction for simple assault where the defendant angrily threw a wooden board at the victim, causing the vict......
-
Cox v. State
...though contradicted, on each element necessary to prove the State's case, the jury's verdict will be upheld." Trzepacz v. State, 240 Ga.App. 410, 411(1), 523 S.E.2d 599 (1999). Viewed in that light, the evidence showed that on August 28, 1998, two thin African-American men entered a conveni......
-
A Better Orientation for Jury Instructions - Charles M. Cork, Iii
...479, 448 S.E.2d 215, 216 (1994); Biggers v. Biggers, 250 Ga. 248, 249, 297 S.E.2d 257, 258-59 (1982). 119. See, e.g., Trzepacz v. State, 240 Ga. App. 410, 411, 523 S.E.2d 599, 600 (1999); Moore v. State, 207 Ga. App. 892, 894, 429 S.E.2d 335, 337 (1993). 120. Hall v. State, 254 Ga. App. 131......