Tubbs v. Oklahoma Tax Com'n

Decision Date22 June 2001
Docket NumberNo. 95,724.,95,724.
Citation2001 OK CIV APP 97,28 P.3d 624
PartiesBilly H. TUBBS, Sr., Petitioner, v. OKLAHOMA TAX COMMISSION and The Workers' Compensation Court, Respondents.
CourtUnited States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Walter Bower, Oklahoma City, OK, for Petitioner.

M. Thad Groom, Tava S. Jones, Oklahoma City, OK, for Respondents.

Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 1.

OPINION

CARL B. JONES, Judge:

¶ 1 Claimant seeks review of a Workers' Compensation Court order which found, inter alia, that Employer was entitled to a credit for overpayment of temporary total disability (TTD) compensation and that Claimant is no longer permanently totally disabled.

¶ 2 An earlier Compensation Court order found that Claimant had sustained a compensable work-related injury to his back on October 30, 1997. Claimant saw Dr. Fellrath, an orthopedic surgeon on February 16, 1998, who found him to be temporarily totally disabled at that time. Claimant has not worked since February 14, 1998. Claimant's medical expert, Dr. Metcalf, also determined Claimant to be TTD from February 16, 1998, until the date of his report, January 24, 2000. Employer's medical expert found Claimant's period of TTD to have ended on May 13, 1999, when he was sufficiently recovered for light duty work. Employer, however, had no light duty assignment it could give Claimant. Employer paid TTD compensation from February 14, 1998, until October 7, 1999, and then again from October 13, 1999, until February 2, 2000. Claimant resigned with his employment with the Oklahoma Tax Commission on August 19, 1999.

¶ 3 The case was tried on December 15, 2000. The trial court found Claimant was not then temporarily totally disabled, but that he had been TTD from February 14, 1998, to August 19, 1999, the date he resigned his employment. The court allowed Employer a credit for $7,084.08, representing the compensation it had paid for 24 weeks subsequent to the August 19, 1999 resignation. Claimant contends this was contrary to law.

¶ 4 To the contrary, recent opinions indicate that the trial court acted correctly. "Temporary total disability" is defined as the healing period, or that period of time following an accidental injury when an employee is totally incapacitated for work due to illness resulting from injury. Bodine v. L.A. King Corp., 1994 OK 22, 869 P.2d 320, 322; Bama Pie, Inc. v. Roberts, 1977 OK 100, 565 P.2d 31, 34. The employee's ability to do light work, but not the same labor he had formerly performed, is sufficient to establish that the employee is not temporarily totally disabled. Id.; Akers v. Seaboard Farms, 1998 OK CIV APP 169, 972 P.2d 885, 887. But if employer has no light duty work available, the injured employee is still entitled to TTD benefits. Hinton v. Labor Source, 1998 OK CIV APP 2, 953 P.2d 358.

¶ 5 The issue then is what effect does Claimant's resignation...

To continue reading

Request your trial
7 cases
  • BE & K. CONST. v. Abbott
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 1 de outubro de 2002
    ...finds support in three non-precedential opinions released for publication by the Court of Civil Appeals:8 Tubbs v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 2001 OK CIV APP 97, 28 P.3d 624; Akers v. Seaboard Farms, 1998 OK CIV APP 169, 972 P.2d 885; and Hinton v. Labor Source, 1998 OK CIV APP 2, 953 P.2d 358.9 ......
  • Urology Ctr. of Southern Okla. v. Miller
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 22 de novembro de 2010
    ...Claimant's loss of employment as a result of his own conduct.Id. at ¶ 12, at 888. ¶ 26 Next, in 2001, COCA issued Tubbs v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 2001 OK CIV APP 97, 28 P.3d 624. The employee was receiving TTD benefits when he was released for light duty. No light duty was available and none ......
  • City of Tulsa v. Mayes
    • United States
    • United States State Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma. Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
    • 8 de dezembro de 2016
    ...to provide the Claimant with "light-duty" work. The court failed to properly apply the principles delineated in Tubbs v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n , 2001 OK CIV APP 97, , and Smith v. Millwood Schools , 2004 OK CIV APP 41, 90 P.3d 564.1 That allegation of error raises and preserves only one issue......
  • Smith v. Millwood Schools, 2004 OK CIV APP 41 (OK 5/20/2004)
    • United States
    • Oklahoma Supreme Court
    • 20 de maio de 2004
    ..."The requirement to offer light duty work to injured employees simply does not extend to former employees," however. Tubbs v. Oklahoma Tax Comm'n, 2001 OK CIV APP 97, ¶5. 28 P.3d 624, ¶7 Dr. Friedman's medical report provides competent evidence Claimant was able to do light duty work and th......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT