Tucker v. State Bd. of Alcoholic Control
Decision Date | 28 April 1954 |
Docket Number | No. 449,449 |
Citation | 81 S.E.2d 399,240 N.C. 177 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | TUCKER, v. STATE BOARD OF ALCOHOLIC CONTROL et al. |
Webster S. Medlin, Concord, for petitioner-appellant.
Atty. Gen. Harry McMullan, Asst. Atty. Gen. Claude L. Love, and Max O. Cogburn, Member of Staff, for the respondents-appellees.
There is no inherent power in any governmental body to hold an election for any purpose. In consequence, an election held without affirmative constitutional or statutory authority is a nullity, no matter how fairly and honestly it may be conducted. Corey v. Hardison, 236 N.C. 147, 72 S.E.2d 416; Rodwell v. Harrison, 132 N.C. 45, 43 S.E. 540; Van Amringe v. Taylor, 108 N.C. 196, 12 S.E. 1005, 12 L.R.A. 202, 23 Am.St.Rep. 51; 18 Am.Jur., Elections, Section 100; 29 C.J.S., Elections, § 66.
In the very nature of things, the result of the local option election held in Cabarrus County on February 21, 1949, was not invalidated under subsection (f) of G.S. § 18-124 by the holding of the municipal primary in the City of Concord within the ensuing sixty days if the municipal primary was a legal nullity. This being so, the appeal poses this problem for solution: Did the mayor and the governing body of the City of Concord have affirmative constitutional or statutory authority to hold the municipal primary?
It is apparent that they had no constitutional warrant for their action. It is likewise apparent that they had no statutory authority for their action unless such authority can be found in the provisions of the Charter of the City of Concord embodied in Sections 11 and 16 of Chapter 716 of the 1947 Session Laws of North Carolina. We quote these sections in inverse numerical order.
The petitioner advances a two-fold argument to support his theory that these sections conferred statutory authority upon the mayor and the...
To continue reading
Request your trial- State v. McClain
- State v. May
-
State v. Hunter
... ... Control by the states over the persons who may be licensed to practice law in their courts would thus be ... ...
-
Di Frega v. Pugliese
... ... State v. Mahaley, 332 N.C. 583, 598, 423 S.E.2d 58, 67 (1992), cert. denied, ... ...