Tucker v. The City of Raleigh

Decision Date30 June 1876
CourtNorth Carolina Supreme Court
PartiesW. H. & R. S. TUCKER v. THE CITY OF RALEIGH.
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

(For the Syllabus, see case between the two parties, 74 N.C. 267.)

CIVIL ACTION, heard before WATTS, J., at January Term, 1876, of WAKE Superior Court.

The facts are substantially the same as in the preceding case between the same parties.

There was judgment in favor of the plaintiff according to the prayer of the complaint, and the defendant appealed.

Busbee & Busbee, for the appellant .

Haywood, Fowle and Snow, contra .

READE, J.

An alternative, and not a peremptory mandamus, is the proper judgment. See opinion filed in a case, between same parties at this term. No error.

PER CURIAM. Judgment accordingly.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • City Of Greensboro v. Stringfellow
    • United States
    • North Carolina Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1905
    ...popular vote. Fawcett v. Mt. Airy, 134 N. C. 125, 45 S. E. 1029, 63 L. R. A. 870; Davis v. Fremont, 135 N. C. 538, 47 S. E. 671; Tucker v. Raleigh, 75 N. C. 272; Wilson v. Charlotte, 74 N. C. 748. In Robinson v. Goldsboro, 135 N. C. 382, 47 S. E. 462, the act requiring a popular vote had no......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT