Tukes v. State, 47003
| Decision Date | 17 March 1972 |
| Docket Number | No. 2,No. 47003,47003,2 |
| Citation | 125 Ga.App. 831,189 S.E.2d 135 |
| Parties | Doretha TUKES v. The STATE |
| Court | Georgia Court of Appeals |
Casey Thigpen, Davisboro, for appellant.
H. R. Thompson, Dist. Atty., Swainsboro, for appellee.
Syllabus Opinion by the Court
Appellant was indicted for the offense of arson and convicted of criminal attempt to commit arson. Error is assigned on the overruling of her motion for new trial on the general grounds only. Held:
We affirm. The record discloses an overwhelming array of evidence to support the verdict of guilty. Her co-defendant testified that she furnished the money to buy the gas, that they went to the dwelling occupied by Willie Ray and others, and that 'I throwed the gas and she throwed the match.' A city policeman testified that he went to the house in answer to a call, saw a blazing fire, and apprehended the defendant and her co-defendant as they ran from the scene. The was other corroborating and damaging evidence.
A person commits arson in the first degree when by means of fire or explosives he knowingly damages 'any dwellinghouse of another without his consent . . .' Code Ann. § 26-1401. The record shows that one of the occupants of the house had deeded the property to the defendant. It is therefore contended that the defendant could not be guilty of arson or attempted arson since she was the legal owner of the premises. This contention is without merit. The offense is committed whether the dwelling house is occupied, unoccupied, or vacant and whether the premises are the property of the defendant or of another. Lawful occupancy by one in charge constitutes ownership as contemplated by the statute, and the question of legal title is not involved. Golding v. State, 30 Ga.App. 30(2), 116 S.E. 881. See also, Rice v. State, 16 Ga.App. 128(3), 84 S.E. 609; Morgan v. State, 120 Ga. 499, 502, 48 S.E. 238; and Harrell v. State, 121 Ga. 607, 49 S.E. 703.
Judgment affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Crawford v. Government Employees Ins. Co.
...type of structure for the purposes of an arson prosecution. State v. Hovers, 148 Ga.App. 431, 251 S.E.2d 397 (1978); Turkes v. State, 125 Ga.App. 831, 189 S.E.2d 135 (1972). See also Wade v. State, 195 Ga. 870, 875, 25 S.E.2d 712 (1943) (one bedroom used as sleeping quarters in building was......
-
Hufstetler v. State, 67571
...forth the crime of first degree arson, OCGA § 16-7-60], and the question of legal title is not involved. [Cits.]" Tukes v. State, 125 Ga.App. 831, 189 S.E.2d 135 (1972). See also State v. Hovers, 148 Ga.App. 431, 251 S.E.2d 397 (1978). Therefore, the "ownership" of the courthouse by the boa......
-
M.E.H., In re, 72535
...are the property of defendant or of another, the act still constitutes arson (or in this case, attempted arson). Tukes v. State, 125 Ga.App. 831, 189 S.E.2d 135 (1972); State v. Hovers, 148 Ga.App. 431, 251 S.E.2d 397 As to consent, having found the house was occupied by the mother and brot......
-
Frost v. State, A91A0074
...one in charge constitutes ownership as contemplated by the statute, and the question of legal title is not involved." Tukes v. State, 125 Ga.App. 831, 189 S.E.2d 135 (1972). See Rash v. State, 182 Ga.App. 655, 356 S.E.2d 719 (1987). Since the "of another" aspect was proved, we need not addr......