Tulley v. BAYFRONT NORTH, LTD.

Decision Date28 September 2001
Citation286 A.D.2d 873,730 N.Y.S.2d 603
PartiesFRANK D. TULLEY et al., Appellants,<BR>v.<BR>BAYFRONT NORTH, LTD., et al., Respondents.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

Present — Pigott, Jr., P. J., Hayes, Hurlbutt, Burns and Gorski, JJ.

Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs.

Memorandum:

Supreme Court properly granted that part of defendants' cross motion for judgment declaring that plaintiffs have no permanent easement to park in the area known as the "title parking area." Parties seeking to establish the existence of a prescriptive easement must demonstrate by clear and convincing evidence that their use of the subject property was adverse, open and notorious, and continuous and uninterrupted for the prescriptive period of 10 years (see, RPAPL 311; Di Leo v Pecksto Holding Corp., 304 NY 505, 512). Further, where use of the subject property was in common with the general public, such parties must show "`some distinctive and decisive act on [their] or [their] predecessors' part indicating an exercise of exclusive right sufficient to notify the owner of the user and of the claim of right' (Pro-Fac Coop. v Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co., 36 AD2d 441, 444 * * *)" (Northtown, Inc. v Vivacqua, 272 AD2d 917, 918). Defendants met their initial burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by submitting evidence in admissible form that plaintiffs' use of the title parking area was in common with the general public, including other residents of the subdivision and nonresidents such as guests and fishermen. Plaintiffs failed, however, to present proof of any act on their part that would provide the requisite notice of a hostile claim (see, Lyon v Melino, 214 AD2d 992, 993). The court therefore properly declared that plaintiffs have no permanent easement to park in the title parking area.

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Clover/Allen's Creek Neighborhood Ass'n v. M & F, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • March 8, 2023
    ... ... , LLC, Monroe Office Suites, LLC, 2875 Monroe Clover, LLC, Cloverpark Ltd. Partnership, and John Does Nos. 1-10, Respondents-Defendants. Brighton ... permissive and not hostile) [Docket # 1328, p. 17]; ... Tulley v. Bayfront N., Ltd. , 286 A.D.2d 873 (4th ... Dept 2001) (court properly ... ...
  • Clover/Allen's Creek Neighborhood Ass'n v. M & F, LLC
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 28, 2022
    ... ... , LLC, Monroe Office Suites, LLC, 2875 Monroe Clover, LLC, Cloverpark Ltd. Partnership, and John Does Nos. 1-10, Respondents-Defendants. Brighton ... located on 10.1 acres on the north side of Monroe Avenue in ... the Town of Brighton (the "Town"). The ... the user and of the claim of right.'" Tulley v ... Bayfront N., Ltd. , 286 A.D.2d 873 (4th Dept 2001) ... ...
  • Bekkering v. Christiana
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • February 27, 2020
    ...act by the claiming party "sufficient to notify the owner of the user and of [his or her] claim of right" (Tulley v. Bayfront N., 286 A.D.2d 873, 873, 730 N.Y.S.2d 603 [2001] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Colin Realty Co., LLC v. Manhasset Pizza, LLC, 137 A.D.3d 838,......
  • Roland v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 28, 2001
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT