Turley, In re, 35423
| Decision Date | 12 June 1973 |
| Docket Number | No. 35423,35423 |
| Citation | 496 S.W.2d 865 |
| Parties | In the Matter of Virgil Lewis TURLEY. . Louis District, Division Two |
| Court | Missouri Court of Appeals |
Clyde S. Cahill, Jr., The Legal Aid Society of City & County of St. Louis, St. Louis, for petitioner-appellant.
Eugene P. Freeman, Deputy City Counselor, St. Louis, for respondents.
Petitioner brought this habeas corpus proceeding to have determined the applicability of Sections 546.615 and 221.180 1 to his sentence of one year in the St. Louis City Workhouse. Upon our determination that both sections were applicable we ordered petitioner discharged if the respondent wardens determined that he had served his sentence in an orderly and peaceable manner. We issue this opinion to clarify for the Bar and Circuit Courts our conclusions regarding sentencing under these statutory provisions.
Petitioner was arrested on August 6, 1972, for shooting into a dwelling house (§ 562.070) and carrying a concealed weapon (§ 564.610), both graded felonies. He was placed in City Jail on August 10, 1972 to await trial. On February 15, 1973 he pleaded guilty to both offenses and was sentenced to two concurrent one year terms in the Workhouse. 2 The trial court disallowed petitioner credit for the time he had spent in jail awaiting trial from August 10 until February 15. Petitioner was advised by the trial judge that workhouse time was 'flat time' not subject to the provisions of § 546.615. In his writ to this court petitioner asserted that that section applies to all felonies regardless of where served and that when he receives credit for jail time plus credit under § 221.180 (the three-fourths rule) he is entitled to be released.
Respondents contend that neither statute applies to sentences served in the City Workhouse.
Section 546.615 provides in pertinent part that: 'A person convicted of a felony . . . shall receive as credit toward service of the sentence imposed all time spent by him in prison or jail both awaiting trial and pending transfer to the department of corrections.' (Emphasis supplied).
Prior to the amendment of this section in 1971, the allowance of jail time was discretionary with the circuit judge. The amendment made such allowance mandatory in felony cases. We do not interpret the last phrase of the section referring to the department of corrections as qualifying this mandatory allowance to those cases where confinement is in an institution operated by the department of corrections. Rather that phrase specifies one of the two times to which the allowance relates, i.e (1) awaiting trial and (2) pending transfer. A convicted felon is entitled to both times if applicable.
The provisions of § 546.615 are for the benefit of the prisoner. We believe there are circumstances in which he may knowingly and intelligently waive the provisions of that section. It may be that a convicted felon confronted by a trial court with a two year penitentiary sentence and allowance of jail time or a one year workhouse sentence without such allowance may, for various reasons, opt to waive the jail time and serve the latter sentence if the court is willing to give him such a choice. But we cannot find such waiver here. The trial court in good faith, but we find erroneously, advised petitioner...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Lay v. State
...the operation of the statute providing credit for time spent in custody before the commencement of a sentence); In re Turley, 496 S.W.2d 865, 866–67 (Mo.Ct.App.1973) (recognizing that the statute for allowance of jail time credit was mandatory but could be waived); Commonwealth v. Byrne, 83......
-
Brown v. State
...of jail time was discretionary with the circuit court. The amendment made such allowance mandatory in felony cases. In re Turley, 496 S.W.2d 865 (Mo.App.1973). There is no dispute here that movant was sentenced before the amendment when credit for jail time was discretionary with the circui......
-
State ex rel. James v. Stamps
...before judgment, when sentenced to confinement other than in custody of the division of corrections, was answered in In Re Turley, 496 S.W.2d 865 (Mo.App.1973). There the court of appeals held that a convicted felon sentenced to a term in the St. Louis City Workhouse must be given credit ag......
-
Buehrle v. Mo. Dep't of Corr.
...be allowed to waive the jail-time credit under certain circumstances, “if the court is willing to give him such a choice.” 496 S.W.2d 865, 867 (Mo.App.1973). First, we note that Turley did not set forth a definite right to waive jail-time credit; rather, it posited that such a waiver could ......