Turner v. Nicholson Properties, Inc.
Decision Date | 12 August 1986 |
Docket Number | No. 281P86,281P86 |
Citation | 347 S.E.2d 457,317 N.C. 714 |
Court | North Carolina Supreme Court |
Parties | Richard TURNER v. NICHOLSON PROPERTIES, INC. |
McMillan, Kimzey, Smith & Roten, Raleigh, for defendant.
John E. Bugg, Durham, for plaintiff.
Upon consideration of the petition filed by Defendant in this matter for discretionary review of the decision of the North Carolina Court of Appeals pursuant to G.S. 7A-31, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals:
"Denied by order of the Court in conference, this the 12th day of August 1986."
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Pinnacle Group, Inc. v. Shrader
...320 N.C. 798, 361 S.E.2d 75 (1987); Turner v. Nixon Properties, Inc., 80 N.C.App. 208, 341 S.E.2d 42, disc. review denied, 317 N.C. 714, 347 S.E.2d 457 (1986); Thomas v. Howard, 51 N.C.App. 350, 276 S.E.2d 743 (1981). Only clear evidence will justify vacating an award. National Bulk Carrier......
-
MCI Construction v. Hazen and Sawyer, 1:99CV00002 (M.D.N.C. 8/29/2003)
...324 N.C. App. 337, 378 S.E.2d 799 (1989); Turner v. Nicholson Properties, Inc., 80 N.C. App. 208, 341 S.E.2d 42, rev, denied. 317 N.C. 714, 347 S.E.2d 457 (1986). Those cases do state that arbitrators cannot be deposed absent a preliminary showing of misconduct. However, they are different ......
-
Aetna Health of the Carolinas v. Piedmont Endocrinology Med. Associates
...this policy'") (quoting Fashion Exhibitors v. Gunter, 291 N.C. 208, 217, 230 S.E.2d 380, 387 (1976)), disc. Review denied, 317 N.C. 714, 347 S.E.2d 457 (1986). In addition, the "general rule [is] that 'errors of law or fact, or an erroneous decision of matters submitted to [arbitration], ar......
-
Carteret County v. United Contractors of Kinston, Inc.
...§ 1-567.13(a)(5) (1983). accord, Turner v. Nicholson Properties, Inc., 80 N.C.App. 208, 341 S.E.2d 42, disc. review denied, 317 N.C. 714, 347 S.E.2d 457 (1986). If the courts were to invalidate awards based upon errors of law, it would "[open the] door for coming into court in almost every ......