Turner v. Turner
Decision Date | 27 July 1978 |
Docket Number | No. 4874,4874 |
Citation | 582 P.2d 600 |
Parties | George W. TURNER, Appellant (Plaintiff below), v. Leland J. TURNER, Appellee (Defendant below). |
Court | Wyoming Supreme Court |
Rex O. Arney, of Redle, Yonkee & Arney, Sheridan, for appellant.
Kim D. Cannon, of Burgess & Davis, Sheridan, for appellee.
Before GUTHRIE, C. J., and McCLINTOCK, RAPER, THOMAS and ROSE, JJ.
This appeal emanates from a summary judgment dismissing appellant's civil action for assault and battery on the ground that it is barred by the Wyoming one-year statute of limitations. 1 Appellant claims circumstances which would deny appellee's resort to the statute or which would at least generate an issue of fact necessitating a trial. We will affirm the summary judgment.
Appellant filed an action on December 8, 1976, 2 for injuries sustained by him as a result of an incident which took place on October 25, 1975. Appellant and appellee are brothers who, with their mother, operate a ranch in Campbell County, Wyoming. According to the depositions and exhibits of the parties, on December 8, 1975, appellant's attorney forwarded a letter to appellee concerning the alleged assault and battery, and indicated therein that:
"George, of course, has one year from the date you struck him, within which to file an action should he elect to do so."
Thereafter, during the summer of 1976, appellee left several $50.00 checks and an elk license refund check with the brothers' mother, indicating that they were for appellant's medical bills. The checks were never cashed although appellant's attorney advised him that he could do so and appellee wrote no further checks. In September, or early October, 1976, appellee offered to pay appellant $3,000.00 for his doctor's bills, if appellant would itemize them. Appellant tendered no itemization because he said appellee made no firm guarantee to pay the bills under such conditions.
On January 7, 1977, appellee filed a motion to dismiss, which was subsequently treated as a motion for summary judgment. Having considered the depositions and exhibits of the parties, as well as the submitted briefs, the trial court made the following findings:
Before determining whether there are any questions of material fact which would preclude a summary judgment it is necessary to ascertain the elements required to establish that a party is estopped from asserting the bar of a statute of limitations. This endeavor is a matter of first impression in Wyoming, but we find more than adequate assistance from other jurisdictions. The applicable principles are concisely summarized in In re Pieper's Estate, 224 Cal.App.2d 670, 37 Cal.Rptr. 46, 60, as follows:
See, generally, 53 C.J.S. Limitations of Actions, § 25; 51 Am.Jur.2d, Limitation of Actions, § 431, et seq.; Annotation, Estoppel Statute of Limitations, 44 A.L.R.3d 482; and Annotation, Statute of Limitations Negotiations, 39 A.L.R.3d 127.
While a finding of equitable estoppel which would prevent resort to a statute of limitations will, in most cases, involve questions of fact, it is apparent that in certain cases this determination will become a matter for the courts. See, Alley v.
Dodge Hotel, 179 U.S.App.D.C. 256, 551 F.2d 442, cert. den. 431 U.S. 958, ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Keene v. Teten
...to ultimate compromise, is not of itself sufficient to establish an estoppel.'" 256 Neb. at 69, 588 N.W.2d at 837, quoting Turner v. Turner, 582 P.2d 600 (Wyo.1978). As noted in Woodard, ordinary settlement negotiations contain the implicit notion that if settlement is not made, litigation ......
-
Boller v. Western Law Associates, P.C., 90-84
...possibility that a defendant may lull the claimant into a reasonable belief that his claim would be settled without suit. Turner v. Turner, 582 P.2d 600 (Wyo.1978). It is recognized that no tolling was effected in any of the cited cases, but the legal principles upon which tolling might occ......
-
Bauer v. State ex rel. Wyoming Worker's Compensation Div., 84-77
...THOMAS, Chief Justice, dissenting. I must dissent from the decision of the majority of the court in this instance. In Turner v. Turner, Wyo., 582 P.2d 600 (1978), this court dealt with the question of estoppel to assert the bar of the statute of limitations. That case did not involve a clai......
-
Woodard v. City of Lincoln
...are conducted in good faith with a view to ultimate compromise, is not of itself sufficient to establish an estoppel." Turner v. Turner, 582 P.2d 600, 603 (Wyo.1978). However, ordinary settlement negotiations contain the implicit notion that if settlement is not reached, then litigation may......