Turner v. Wickliffe
Decision Date | 14 February 1912 |
Citation | 143 S.W. 406,146 Ky. 776 |
Parties | TURNER v. WICKLIFFE. |
Court | Kentucky Court of Appeals |
Appeal from Circuit Court, Ballard County.
Action between Henry F. Turner and J. B. Wickliffe, assignee of Farmers' Bank of Wickliffe. On motion to dismiss appeal with damages. Motion to dismiss granted, and motion for damages overruled.
J. B. Wickliffe, pro se.
Section 749 of the Code regulating supersedeas on appeals to this court is as follows:
This appeal was granted September 6, 1911. The time for filing the record in this court expired in December, 1911. The bond was executed before the clerk of the circuit court on February 5, 1912, and the supersedeas was issued by him on the same day. He had no power then to issue a supersedeas. He had power then to take the bond, but the supersedeas could properly then be issued only by the clerk of this court. The supersedeas, being issued without authority, was void, and did not suspend the execution of the judgment. No damages can therefore be awarded.
The motion to dismiss the appeal with costs is sustained, the transcript not having been filed in time; but the motion for 10 per cent. damages is overruled.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Wermeling v. Wermeling
...N. R. Co. v. Smith's Adm'r, 178 Ky. 681, 199 S.W. 805; Asher v. Cornett, 126 Ky. 569, 104 S.W. 347, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 957; Turner v. Wickliffe, 146 Ky. 776, 143 S.W. 406; Torbitt, etc., v. Middlesboro Groc. Co., 147 Ky. 343, 144 S.W. 16; City of Ashland v. Stewart, 214 Ky. 682, 283 S.W. 1012;......
-
Ward v. Martin, Sheriff
...v. Hite's Ex'r, 154 Ky. 61, 157 S.W. 41, 42; Torbitt & Castleman v. Middlesboro Grocery Co., 147 Ky. 343, 144 S. W. 16; Turner v. Wickliffe, 146 Ky. 776, 143 S.W. 406; Asher v. Cornett, 126 Ky. 569, 104 S.W. 347, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 957; Leonard's Adm'r v. Cowling, 121 Ky. 631, 87 S.W. 812, 89 ......
-
Ward v. Martin
...89 S.W. 131, 27 Ky. Law Rep. 1059, 28 Ky. Law Rep. 145; Asher v. Cornett, 126 Ky. 569, 104 S.W. 347, 31 Ky. Law Rep. 957; Turner v. Wickliffe, 146 Ky. 776, 143 S.W. 406; Torbitt & Castleman v. Middlesboro Grocery Co., 147 Ky. 144 S.W. 16." Chapter 34 of the 1926 Acts, supra, prescribes that......
-
Interstate Acceptance Corp. v. Rosenblatt
...recover on the ground that it is enforceable as a common-law obligation. In support of the contention appellee cites Turner v. Wickliffe, 146 Ky. 776, 143 S.W. 406; Louisville & N. R. R. Co. v. Smith's Adm'r, 178 Ky. 681, 199 S.W. 805; Philips, et al. v. Robinson, 225 Ky. 682, 9 S.W.2d 995,......