Tutor Time Child Care/Learning Ctrs. v. Patterson, 1D11–2854.
Decision Date | 03 July 2012 |
Docket Number | No. 1D11–2854.,1D11–2854. |
Citation | 91 So.3d 264 |
Parties | TUTOR TIME CHILD CARE/LEARNING CENTERS and Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc., Appellants, v. Laylita PATTERSON, Appellee. |
Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Patrick John McGinley of the Law Office of Patrick John McGinley, P.A., Winter Park, for Appellants.
William A. Kempner of Kempner Law, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellee.
In this workers' compensation appeal, the employer/carrier (E/C) argues the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred by: (1) determining that section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes (2008), was not only a business records exception to the hearsay rule under section 90.803(6), Florida Statutes, but also an exception to the section 90.901, Florida Statutes, rule requiring documents be authenticated; (2) failing to require Claimant to prove that her subsequent workplace accident did not break the chain of causation; (3) barring cross-examination of Claimant concerning her choice of treatment regimens; and (4) awarding attorney's fees and costs. We affirm the JCC's determinations on the third and fourth issues without further comment. We also affirm the first two issues based on the following analysis.
Section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes, first appeared in the extensive re-write of chapter 440 enacted in the 1993 special legislative session. See Ch. 93–415, § 32, at 153, Laws of Fla. Section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes (2008), provides:
All medical reports of authorized treating health care providers relating to the claimant and subject accident shall be received into evidence by the [JCC] upon proper motion. However, such records must be served on the opposing party at least 30 days before the final hearing. This section does not limit any right of further discovery, including, but not limited to, depositions.
The clear purpose of this statute is to streamline the evidentiary process and do away with the necessity of calling a records custodian to introduce certain medical records.
Medical Reports.Section 440.29(4) provides that “[a]ll medical reports of authorized treating health care providers relating to the claimant and subject accident” are admissible “upon proper motion.” The provision allows the admission of specified medical reports without the necessity of calling the medical record custodian if “proper motion” is made....
Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 103.3 (2011 ed.) (emphasis added).
Records custodians are normally called for two purposes, to establish that the records meet the criteria of the business records hearsay exception and to establish the authenticity of the records.
Section 440.29(4) relates only to the reports of physicians authorized by the E/C to provide the claimant with medical treatment. See ITT/Palm Coast Utils. v. Douglas, 696 So.2d 390 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997) ( ). Thus, these records are readily available to E/C's.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Vaughan v. Broward Gen. Med. Ctr.
...any right of further discovery, including, but not limited to, depositions.(Emphasis added.) In Tutor Time Child Care/Learning Centers v. Patterson, 91 So.3d 264, 265 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012), this court stated “The clear purpose of this statute is to streamline the evidentiary process and do aw......
-
Young v. Am. Airlines
...by section 440.29(4), Florida Statutes, does not apply to independent medical examinations. Cf. Tutor Time Child Care/Learning Ctrs. v. Patterson, 91 So.3d 264 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (explaining purpose of business records exception for medical reports concerning workers' compensation claims).......
-
K.M.H. v. State
...91 So.3d 262K.M.H., A Child, Appellant,v.STATE of Florida, Appellee.No ... ...