Twp. Bd. of Educ. of Twp. 44 v. Hackmann
Decision Date | 31 July 1871 |
Parties | TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION OF TOWNSHIP 44, RANGE 12, Respondent, v. JOHN G. HACKMANN, Appellant. |
Court | Missouri Supreme Court |
Appeal from Cole Circuit Court.
Edwards & Son, and G. T. White, for appellant.
The use must be such as is public in its character, and not merely public because declared such. (East St. Louis v. St. John, 47 Ill. 90; Am. Law Reg. 56; id. 164-75; Buffalo & N. Y. R.R. Co. v. Brainard, 5 Seld. 100; 6 How. 545.) “If there is no public necessity, there is no public right, and land taken without such necessity is unlawfully taken, though paid for.” (3 Pars. 542; Newby v. Platte County, 25 Mo. 258; Bennett v. Boyle, 40 Barb. 551; 1 Simmons, 412; 44 Mo. 540.) No public inconvenience could have been caused by the location not being made in appellant's field, and it operating as a private mischief. (44 Mo. 486.)
H. B. Johnson, with A. Budd, for respondent.
I. The statutory provision (2 Wagn. Stat. 1247, § 26) authorizing the condemnation of land for public use as a site for a school-house, is constitutional. (Curtis, Adm'r, v. Whipple, 24 Wis. 350; Williams v. School District, 33 Verm. 271; Cooley on Const. Lim. 533, and cases cited.)
II. When the use for which property is taken is of a public character, it rests with the wisdom of the Legislature to determine when and in what manner the public security requires its exercise; and with the reasonableness of the exercise of that discretion the courts will not interfere. (Williams v. School District, supra;Charles River Bridge v. Warren Bridge, 11 Pet. 420; Swan v. Williams, 2 Mich. 427; Beekman v. Sar. & S. R.R. Co., 3 Paige, 73; Harris v. Thompson, 9 Barb. 350; Hartwell v. Armstrong, 19 Barb. 166.)
III. Whether in this particular case the requisite necessity existed for taking this particular piece of land, was a question of fact to be determined solely by the majority of the voters of the sub-district. (Williams v. School District, supra; Paine v. Leicester, 22 Verm. 44; West River Bridge Co. v. Dix, 16 Verm. 446.)CURRIER, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court.
This was a proceeding under the statute (Wagn. Stat. 1244, 1247, §§ 12, 20; id. 327-8, §§ 3, 4) for the condemnation of land for a public school-house site. The constitutionality of the law authorizing such condemnation is called in question, and its invalidity, as in conflict with section 16, article I, of the constitution, is insisted upon as a ground for reversing the judgment of the court below. This is the main matter urged against the action of the Circuit Court.
The ground is taken that the appropriation of property for the use of a local school district is not an appropriation of it to a public use. This theory is based upon the notion that the proposed use is local and limited, and not for the benefit of the public generally. On this subject Poland, J., in Williams v. School District No. 6 (33 Verm. 271), makes the following observations:
I concur in these views and adopt them as my own, and am consequently of the opinion that the objection taken to the constitutionality of the law in question is not well founded. In the case above cited the subject...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Kansas & Texas Coal Railway v. Northwestern Coal & Mining Company
... ... Dom., sec. 14; De Camp v. Railroad, 47 N. J. L ... 44; Board of Health v. Van Hoesen, 87 Mich. 533; ... of ... Edu. v. Hackmann, 48 Mo. 243; M. & G. Road Co. v ... Renfroe, 58 Mo ... ...
-
In re Proceeding to Restrict use of Property Along Gladstone Boulevard
... ... J. 558, sec. 40; Township ... Board v. Hackmann, 48 Mo. 243; County Court v ... Griswold, 58 Mo. 176; ... 99; Willison v ... Cooke, 54 Colo. 320, 44 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1030; ... Kansas City Gunning Co. v ... ...
-
Sisson v. Board of Sup'rs of Buena Vista County
...making disclosure of influence, more or less marked, upon private rights and property interests. Bankhead v. Brown, supra. Township, etc., v. Hackmann, 48 Mo. 243. Perhaps no nearer approach to accuracy in the way of general statement can be had than to say that the mandate of the Constitut......
-
Sisson v. Bd. of Sup'rs of Buena Vista Cnty.
...making disclosure of influence, more or less marked, upon private rights and property interests. Bankhead v. Brown, supra. Township, etc., v. Hackmann, 48 Mo. 243. Perhaps no nearer approach to accuracy in the way of a general statement can be had than to say that the mandate of the Constit......