Tyler v. State, 44844

Decision Date23 February 1972
Docket NumberNo. 44844,44844
Citation476 S.W.2d 291
PartiesClarence TYLER, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, Appellee.
CourtTexas Court of Criminal Appeals

Buddy Stevens, Houston, for appellant.

Carol S. Vance, Dist. Atty., and Phyllis Bell and Ronald G. Woods, Asst. Dist. Attys., Houston, and Jim D. Vollers, State's Atty., Austin, for the State.

OPINION

DAVIS, Commissioner.

This is an appeal from a conviction for possession of marihuana. The appellant, after being duly admonished, entered a plea of guilty before the court and punishment was assessed at five years.

Appellant's sole contention is that the evidence is insufficient to support a finding of guilty.

The State offered stipulations into evidence concerning the testimony of the arresting officer who recovered the marihuana from appellant, and the testimony of the chemist who examined same. Appellant complains that the stipulations were insufficient in that the record is void of any showing that appellant agreed that these stipulations were true and correct and, therefore, the stipulations were insufficient to support the conviction.

We need not pass upon this contention, since appellant made the following judicial admission in writing: 'That I did on August 12, 1970, in Harris County, Texas possess unlawfully the narcotic drug marijuana.'

The judicial confession is sufficient to support the conviction under Article 1.15, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Soto v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 456 S.W.2d 389; Sprinkle v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 456 S.W.2d 387.

The judgment is affirmed.

ODOM, J., not participating.

Opinion approved by the court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • Morris v. State, 197-84
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • April 30, 1986
    ...6 Soto v. State, 456 S.W.2d 389 (Tex.Cr.App.1970); Drain v. State, 465 S.W.2d 939, 940, n. 1 (Tex.Cr.App.1971); Tyler v. State, 476 S.W.2d 291 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Schreiber v. State, 480 S.W.2d 688 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Knight v. State, 481 S.W.2d 143 (Tex.Cr.App.1972); Higginbotham v. State, 4......
  • Patterson v. State, 46266
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • December 6, 1972
    ...support the conviction under Article 1.15, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P.; Knight v. State, 481 S.W.2d 143; East v. State, 476 S.W.2d 292; Tyler v. State, 476 S.W.2d 291; Soto v. State, 456 S.W.2d Appellant contends that he was influenced and persuaded to plead guilty by offers of an assistant distric......
  • Araiza v. State, 46524
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • March 7, 1973
    ...1.15, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. Knight v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 481 S.W.2d 143; East v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 292; Tyler v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 476 S.W.2d 291; Soto v. State, Tex.Civ.App., 456 S.W.2d No motion for rehearing will be filed by the clerk except by leave of this Court upon a s......
  • Knight v. State
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Criminal Appeals
    • June 7, 1972
    ...is sufficient to support the conviction under Art. 1.15, Vernon's Ann.C.C.P. East v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 292; Tyler v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 476 S.W.2d 291; Soto v. State, Tex.Cr.App.,456 S.W.2d 389 Appellant contends that his confession is insufficient to establish corpus delecti ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT