Tyrrell v. Tyrrell

Decision Date28 June 1979
Citation47 N.Y.2d 937,419 N.Y.S.2d 969
Parties, 393 N.E.2d 1041 In the Matter of Patricia TYRRELL, Respondent, v. Lillian TYRRELL, Appellant.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the opinion by Mr. Justice Stewart F. Hancock, Jr. at the Appellate Division (67 A.D.2d 247, 415 N.Y.S.2d 723, decided April 13, 1979).

COOKE, C. J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER and MEYER, JJ., concur.

FUCHSBERG, J., taking no part.

To continue reading

Request your trial
22 cases
  • Tucker v. Martin
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 2 Julio 2010
    ...of the custody of his or her child ( see e.g. Matter of Tyrrell v. Tyrrell, 67 A.D.2d 247, 251, 415 N.Y.S.2d 723, affd. 47 N.Y.2d 937, 419 N.Y.S.2d 969, 393 N.E.2d 1041). While the "protracted separation" of a parent from a child may, when coupled with other factors, be sufficient to establ......
  • La Croix v. Deyo
    • United States
    • New York Family Court
    • 4 Noviembre 1981
    ...40 A.D.2d 130, 338 N.Y.S.2d 838 (3rd Dept. 1972); Tyrrell v. Tyrrell, 67 A.D.2d 247, 415 N.Y.S.2d 247, affd. 47 N.Y.2d 937, 419 N.Y.S.2d 969, 393 N.E.2d 1041 (4th Dept.) and the Family Court (Matter of Spencer, 74 Misc.2d 557, 346 N.Y.S.2d 645 (1973)). Thus courts have "not hesitated to hol......
  • La Croix v. Deyo
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 17 Junio 1982
    ...v. Lascaris, 53 N.Y.2d 204, 440 N.Y.S.2d 884, 423 N.E.2d 361; Tyrrell v. Tyrrell, 67 A.D.2d 247, 415 N.Y.S.2d 723, affd. 47 N.Y.2d 937, 419 N.Y.S.2d 969, 393 N.E.2d 1041). We have considered respondent's remaining arguments and find them unpersuasive. The order should be Order affirmed, Fam......
  • Pernice v. Cote
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • 30 Enero 1986
    ...an extraordinary circumstance (see, Matter of Tyrrell v. Tyrrell, 67 A.D.2d 247, 249-250, 415 N.Y.S.2d 723, affd. 47 N.Y.2d 937, 419 N.Y.S.2d 969, 393 N.E.2d 1041). Indeed, upon stipulating to custody with decedent in settlement of their divorce action, respondent reserved significant visit......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT