Tyson v. The Florida Bar, SC01-2179.
Decision Date | 05 September 2002 |
Docket Number | No. SC01-2179.,SC01-2179. |
Citation | 826 So.2d 265 |
Parties | Charles Terry TYSON, Petitioner, v. THE FLORIDA BAR, Respondent. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
Charles T. Tyson, pro se, Sanderson, FL, for Petitioner.
No Appearance, for Respondent.
Petitioner Charles Terry Tyson petitions this Court for a writ of mandamus commanding The Florida Bar to reopen its investigation into alleged prosecutorial misconduct by an assistant state attorney for the Fourth Judicial Circuit of Florida. Because petitioner cannot demonstrate that the Bar has failed to perform some duty which he has a clear legal right to have performed, this Court has no jurisdiction to issue the writ and we therefore dismiss the petition. See Kobayashi v. Kobayashi, 777 So.2d 951, 951 (Fla.2000)
(. )
Petitioner alleges that he filed a letter complaint with the Bar asserting that the assistant state attorney engaged in prosecutorial misconduct, in the context of the criminal prosecution that resulted in petitioner's current incarceration in the state prison system, by withholding relevant police reports from the defense, despite defense requests for these materials during discovery, and by presenting perjured testimony by a law enforcement witness for the State. Petitioner indicates that the Bar opened a disciplinary file following its preliminary review of his complaint. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.3(a) (); R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.3(b) ().
Petitioner alleges that, after opening the disciplinary file, the Bar conducted an independent investigation during which it both interviewed the attorney appointed by the court to represent petitioner in the context of his criminal proceedings, and obtained a response from the assistant state attorney wherein he denied the allegations made by petitioner. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.3(b) (). Petitioner asserts that he subsequently received correspondence from bar counsel indicating that, after having reviewed all of petitioner's submissions, there appeared to be no basis for further action on petitioner's complaint by the Bar and advising petitioner that the file would therefore be closed. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.3(d) (). This letter from bar counsel, which petitioner attached as an exhibit to his petition in this Court, sets forth at length the reasons supporting bar counsel's determination that no further action was warranted. See R. Regulating Fla. Bar 3-7.3(d) ().
Petitioner alleges that he thereafter unsuccessfully sought informal review of bar counsel's decision to close the disciplinary file within the hierarchical personnel structure of the Bar.1 Petitioner alleges in his petition that he received correspondence from bar counsel's superiors at the Bar, which he attached as exhibits to his petition in this Court, informing him that the disciplinary file had been independently reviewed by these individuals and that they concurred with the decision by bar counsel to close the file and pursue no further action. At that point, petitioner initiated these proceedings requesting this Court to independently review his complaint against the assistant state attorney and issue a writ of mandamus commanding The Florida Bar to reopen its investigation into the allegations that this attorney engaged in unethical conduct during the course of petitioner's criminal trial.
"This Court routinely receives inquiries from individuals who are unhappy with the Bar's handling of their complaint against an attorney." Amendments to the Rules Regulating the Florida Bar, 763 So.2d 1002, 1003 (Fla.2000). The role of...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Howard v. Harris
... ... No. 4:22cv97-AW-MAF United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division February 15, 2023 ... ... Defendant Shanee ... Hinson is an attorney with The Florida Bar. Defendant Roy ... Jeter is an accountant with The Florida Bar. Id ... involved.” Tyson v. The Fla. Bar , 826 So.2d ... 265, 268 (Fla. 2002) (quoting In re ... ...
-
Markowitz v. Helen Homes of Kendall Corp.
... ... No. SC96244 ... Supreme Court of Florida ... September 5, 2002 ... 826 So.2d 257 Joel D ... ...
-
In re Bombardier
...and these findings support the Board's conclusion. ¶ 22. Respondent's reliance on Tyson v. The Fla. Bar is misplaced. 826 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2002) (per curiam). In that case, the court recognized that a dissatisfied client has no right to demand that the state bar file disciplinary charges aga......
-
In re Bombardier
...and these findings support the Board's conclusion.¶ 22. Respondent's reliance on Tyson v. The Florida Bar is misplaced. 826 So.2d 265 (Fla. 2002) (per curiam). In that case, the court recognized that a dissatisfied client has no right to demand that the state bar file disciplinary charges a......