U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Martinez

Citation2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03981,139 A.D.3d 548,34 N.Y.S.3d 3
Decision Date19 May 2016
Docket Number1215N, 380626/12.
PartiesU.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass Through Certificate for Wmalt Series 2007–2 Trust, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Jacobo MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants, Wanys Martinez, Defendant–Appellant.
CourtNew York Supreme Court Appellate Division

139 A.D.3d 548
34 N.Y.S.3d 3
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 03981

U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION as Trustee for WAMU Mortgage Pass Through Certificate for Wmalt Series 2007–2 Trust, Plaintiff–Respondent,
v.
Jacobo MARTINEZ, et al., Defendants,

Wanys Martinez, Defendant–Appellant.

1215N, 380626/12.

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department, New York.

May 19, 2016.


34 N.Y.S.3d 4

McCallion & Associates LLP, New York (Kenneth F. McCallion of counsel), for appellant.

Fein, Such & Crane, LLP, Syracuse (John A. Cirando of counsel), for respondent.

TOM, J.P., SAXE, RICHTER, GISCHE, and WEBBER, JJ.

139 A.D.3d 549

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered January 28, 2015, which denied defendant Wanys Martinez's motion to vacate her default in answering the complaint and for leave to extend her time to file an answer to the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The motion court properly found that jurisdiction, in this mortgage foreclosure action, had been obtained over defendant Wanys Martinez and thus she had not established entitlement to vacatur pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4). Defendant's conclusory denial of service failed to rebut the presumption of service created by the process server's properly executed affidavit (see Matter of de Sanchez, 57 A.D.3d 452, 454, 870 N.Y.S.2d 24 [1st Dept.2008] ), which reflects that service was effectuated by delivering the summons and complaint

34 N.Y.S.3d 5

“to a person of suitable age and discretion at [defendant's] actual ... dwelling place or usual place of abode,” followed by the requisite mailing (CPLR 308[2] ). Defendant admitted that, at the time of service, the subject property was still her “legal address” and that she had only “taken up temporary residence elsewhere,” at an unspecified location, which claim was not substantiated with any documentary evidence. As defendant “never established a permanent alternative ‘actual dwelling’ or ‘usual place of abode’...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • PV Holding Corp. v. Fernandez
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • December 22, 2022
    ...to demonstrate substitute service under CPLR 308(2) and create a presumption of proper service (see e.g. U.S. Bank N.A. v Martinez, 139 A.D.3d 548, 549 [1st Dept 2016]). Contrary to nominal defendant movants' contention that Fernandez's deposition testimony from the Queens County action amo......
  • Wilmington Sav. Fund Soc'y v. Marrero
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • May 2, 2022
    ...belied by the documentary evidence (cf. Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC v AH, 180 A.D.3d 591 [1st Dept 2020]; U.S. BankN.A. v Martinez, 139 A.D.3d 548, 549 [1st Dept 2016]). The mortgage at issue, signed by both Okryun and Juan Marrero, states their address is 453 New Hempstead Road, New City, Ne......
  • Voulkoudis v. Frantzeskakis
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court Appellate Division
    • June 25, 2020
    ...Mr. Frantzeskakis failed to establish a reasonable excuse for his delay in answering the complaint (see e.g. U.S. Bank N.A. v. Martinez, 139 A.D.3d 548, 549–550, 34 N.Y.S.3d 3 [1st Dept. 2016] ; Citibank, 144 A.D.3d at 476, 41 N.Y.S.3d 29 ). Since he failed to set forth a reasonable excuse,......
  • Nationstar Mortg. LLC v. Vladimir Slavutsky, Yanna Slavutsky, Agri Exotic Trading Inc.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court (New York)
    • June 16, 2017
    ...be made at defendant's "dwelling place or usual place of abode, followed by the requisite mailing"(U.S. Bank National Ass'n v. Martinez, 139 A.D. 3d 548, 34 N.Y.S. 3d 2 [1st Dept., 2016] quoting CPLR §308[2]). A process server's affidavit is prima facie evidence of proper service. The defen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT