U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n v. Eaddy
| Decision Date | 21 December 2010 |
| Citation | 79 A.D.3d 1022,914 N.Y.S.2d 901 |
| Parties | U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. Shelley R. EADDY, appellant, et al., defendants. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Thomas J. Minotti, P.C., Highland, N.Y., for appellant.
Hogan Lovells US, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Allison J. Schoenthal, Victoria McKenney, and Jessica L. Ellsworth of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant Shelley R. Eaddy appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Rockland County (Berliner, J.), dated September 9, 2009, which granted the plaintiff's motion, in effect, for summary judgment on the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff met its initial burden of establishing its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by producing the mortgage, the unpaid note, and documentation evidencing the appellant's default in her payment obligations ( see Ferri v. Ferri, 71 A.D.3d 949, 896 N.Y.S.2d 890; Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. v. Delphonse, 64 A.D.3d 624, 625, 883 N.Y.S.2d 135; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Mastropaolo, 42 A.D.3d 239, 241-242, 837 N.Y.S.2d 247). In opposition, the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact. The appellant waived any defense based on the plaintiff's alleged lack of standing because she failed to interpose an answer asserting the defense or file a timely pre-answer motion raising that defense ( see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Jackson, 68 A.D.3d 805, 889 N.Y.S.2d 477; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Mastropaolo, 42 A.D.3d at 244, 837 N.Y.S.2d 247).
The appellant's remaining contentions either are improperly raised for the first time on appeal, are without merit, or have been rendered academic by our determination.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Moise v. Ocwen Loan Servicing LLC (In re Moise)
...Deutsche Bank Nat'l Trust Co. v. Hussain , 78 A.D.3d 989, 912 N.Y.S.2d 595, 596 (2d Dep't 2010) (same); U.S. Bank Nat'l Assn. v. Eaddy , 79 A.D.3d 1022, 914 N.Y.S.2d 901 (2d Dep't 2010) (same); HSBC Bank, USA v. Dammond , 59 A.D.3d 679, 875 N.Y.S.2d 490, 491 (2d Dep't 2009) ("having failed ......
-
Wilmington Trust Co. v. Hurtado
...950 N.Y.S.2d 581 [2d Dept 2012] ; HSBC Bank, USA v. Schwartz, 88 AD3d 961, 931 N.Y.S.2d 528 [2d Dept 2011] ; U.S. Bank Natl. Ass'n v. Eaddy, 79 AD3d 1022, 914 N.Y.S.2d 901 [2010] ). Nor may it be used to support an untimely motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (see Southstar III, LLC v. ......
-
Citigroup v. Kopelowitz
...raising that defense (see HSBC Bank USA, NA v. Schwartz, 88 A.D.3d 961, 931 N.Y.S.2d 528 [2d Dept 2011] ; U.S. Bank N.A. v. Eaddy, 79 A.D.3d 1022, 914 N.Y.S.2d 901 [2d Dept 2010] ; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Perez, 70 A.D.3d 817, 817–818, 894 N.Y.S.2d 509 [2d Dept 2010], cert denied ––......
-
Hsbc Bank U.S. v. Schwartz
...to interpose an answer which asserted the defense or to file a timely pre-answer motion raising that defense ( see U.S. Bank N.A. v. Eaddy, 79 A.D.3d 1022, 914 N.Y.S.2d 901; Wells Fargo Bank Minn., N.A. v. Perez, 70 A.D.3d 817, 817–818, 894 N.Y.S.2d 509, cert. denied ––– U.S. ––––, 131 S.Ct......