U.S. Bank Nat'l Ass'n v. Weinman
| Citation | 151 N.Y.S.3d 115,195 A.D.3d 976 |
| Decision Date | 23 June 2021 |
| Docket Number | Index No. 4754/10,2017–12841, 2017–12842 |
| Parties | US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent, v. Caroline Waloski WEINMAN, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
195 A.D.3d 976
151 N.Y.S.3d 115
US BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc., respondent,
v.
Caroline Waloski WEINMAN, appellant.
2017–12841, 2017–12842
Index No. 4754/10
Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Argued—March 11, 2021
June 23, 2021
Abrams, Fensterman, Fensterman, Eisman, Formato, Ferrara, Wolf & Carone, LLP, Lake Success, N.Y. (Christopher A. Gorman of counsel), for appellant.
Aldridge Pite LLP (Reed Smith LLP, New York, N.Y. [Andrew B. Messite and Michael V. Margarella ], of counsel), for respondent.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN, J.P., COLLEEN D. DUFFY, ANGELA G. IANNACCI, PAUL WOOTEN, JJ.
DECISION & ORDER
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Thomas F. Whelan, J.), dated July 28, 2017, and (2) an order of the same court also dated July 28, 2017. The first order granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint, to strike the defendant's answer, and for an order of reference, and denied the defendant's cross motion to compel discovery. The second order also granted the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint, to strike the defendant's answer, and for an order of reference, and appointed a referee to compute the amount due to the plaintiff.
ORDERED that the first order is modified, on the law, by deleting the provision thereof granting the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment on the complaint, to strike the defendant's answer, and for an order of reference, and substituting therefor a provision denying that motion; as so modified, the first order is affirmed, and the second order is vacated; and it is further,
ORDERED that the appeal from the second order is dismissed as academic in light of our determination on the appeal from the first order; and it is further,
ORDERED that one bill of costs is awarded to the defendant.
On July 14, 2005, Caroline Waloski Weinman (hereinafter the defendant) executed a note in favor of nonparty Wall Street Mortgage Bankers Ltd., doing business as Power Express (hereinafter Power Express), in the sum of $600,000, which was secured by a mortgage on certain premises in Greenport.
On February 2, 2010, Power Express's successor in interest, the plaintiff, commenced this action to foreclose the mortgage against, among others, the defendant.
In an order dated September 13, 2013, the Supreme Court, inter alia, granted those branches of the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Owemanco Mortg. NY P'ship v. Q.Y. Tang's Hwa Yan
...in admissible form as the affidavit proffered by Plaintiff failed to satisfy the requisites of CPLR §4518 (see U.S. Bank N.A. v Weinman, 195 A.D.3d 976, 978 [2d Dept 2021]; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v Talley, 153 A.D.3d 583, 585 [2d Dept 2017]). Further, since the allonges at issue were not on......
-
938 St. Nicholas Ave. Lender v. 936-938 Cliffcrest Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
...in admissible form as the affidavits proffered by Plaintiff failed to satisfy the requisites of CPLR §4518 (see U.S. Bank NA. v. Weinman, 195 A.D.3d 976, 978 [2d Dept 2021]; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Talley, 153 A.D.3d 583, 585 [2d Dept 2017]). Further, since the indorsements and allonges a......
-
938 St. Nicholas Ave. Lender v. 936-938 Cliffcrest Hous. Dev. Fund Corp.
...in admissible form as the affidavits proffered by Plaintiff failed to satisfy the requisites of CPLR §4518 (see U.S. Bank NA. v. Weinman, 195 A.D.3d 976, 978 [2d Dept 2021]; Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Talley, 153 A.D.3d 583, 585 [2d Dept 2017]). Further, since the indorsements and allonges a......
-
Wells Fargo Bank v. Gittens
... ... evidence'" (id., quoting Deutsche Bank ... Natl. Trust Co. v Elshiekh, 179 A.D.3d 1017, 1020) ... Here, the plaintiff ... LLC, 175 A.D.3d 474, 475; cf. U.S. Bank N.A. v ... Weinman, 195 A.D.3d 976) ... Accordingly, ... the Supreme ... ...