U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co.
Decision Date | 04 February 1931 |
Docket Number | No. 1188-5525.,1188-5525. |
Citation | 34 S.W.2d 815 |
Parties | U. S. FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. BALDWIN MOTOR CO. |
Court | Texas Supreme Court |
Seay, Seay, Malone & Lipscomb, of Dallas, and Tomas G. Pollard, of Tyler, for plaintiff in error.
Edwards & Hughes, of Tyler, for defendant in error.
The Baldwin Motor Company brought this suit to recover attorneys' fees and expenses incurred in defending itself against a damage suit filed in the district court of Angelina county by the parents of Florine Eugenia Rogers, a child seven years of age, because of the child's death at Lufkin, in said county, on March 5, 1928, alleged to have been the result of the Baldwin Motor Company's negligence.
The Baldwin Motor Company carried a liability policy with the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company.
Upon being sued, the motor company notified the insurer to defend the suit in accordance with the terms of the policy. The insurance company's contention was that the policy did not cover the accident in question, and it refused to defend the suit; whereupon the motor company, after employing attorneys and making an investigation, succeeded in having the Rogers suit dismissed.
The material portions of the policy are as follows:
The statements as to location, addresses, and places of business are as follows:
The policy also provided that it shall cover no liability of the assured for any injuries or damage caused by an automobile while being operated by any person under sixteen years of age, or when used in any race or speed contest.
The petition by Mr. and Mrs. Rogers against the Baldwin Motor Company alleged that the Baldwin Motor Company was a domestic corporation, with principal office and place of business in Tyler, Smith county, Tex., with a local office and place of business and a local agency and agent in the city of Lufkin, Angelina county, Tex., where it was operating and doing business on the 5th day of March, 1928; that, on the date of the death of the girl, the Baldwin Motor Company was operating a garage and automobile sales agency in the City of Lufkin, and in the conduct of said business they employed certain agents and servants to carry on their business, among said employees being one Deloach O'Neil, a negro boy, fifteen years of age, who was in the performance of his duties to the Baldwin Motor Company at the time of the accident.
The petition alleged that the negro boy, while in the company's employ and operating one of its automobiles, negligently ran over and killed the minor child of the plaintiffs therein; said negligence was predicated upon "one or more of the following acts of negligence of said employee, operating either singularly or concurrently to produce said injuries and death," viz.:
(a) Operating said automobile at a rate of speed of forty miles per...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Hardware Mut. Casualty Co. v. Hilderbrandt
...the coverage. Fulton Company v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co., 138 Tenn. 278, 197 S.W. 866; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co., Tex.Com.App., 34 S.W.2d 815; Texas Indemnity Insurance Co. v. McLelland, Tex. Civ.App., 80 S.W.2d 1101; Commercial Standard Insuran......
-
Travelers Ins. Co. v. Newsom
...made the investigation and was asking the company to take as true his own investigations showing contrary to the allegations. In the Baldwin Motor Co. case by our Commission of Appeals, cited in the footnote, the insurance police provided it did not cover injuries or damages caused by an au......
-
American Casualty Co. of Reading, Pa. v. Myrick
...161 Tex. 263, 339 S.W.2d 660; Home Ins. Co., New York v. Rose, 152 Tex. 222, 255 S.W. 2d 861; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co., Tex.Com. App., 34 S.W.2d 815; United American Ins. Co. v. Pittillo, Tex.Civ.App., 308 S.W.2d 241; 32 Tex.Jur.2d 102, Insurance § 54. Ther......
-
Satterwhite v. Stolz
...is not required to defend. Travelers Insurance Co. v. Newsom, 352 S.W.2d 888 (Tex.Civ.App.1961); United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Baldwin Motor Co., 34 S.W.2d 815 (Tex.Com.App.1931). What are the allegations of plaintiff's complaint? Two claims are asserted. First, plaintiff alleges......