U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 82-1609

Decision Date10 November 1982
Docket NumberNo. 82-1609,82-1609
Citation421 So.2d 783
PartiesUNITED STATES FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY, a foreign corporation, Petitioner, v. CLEARWATER OAKS BANK, a Florida banking corporation, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Leslie King O'Neal of Markel, Scott, McDonough & O'Neal, P.A., Orlando, for petitioner.

William L. Lyman, Clearwater, for respondent.

GRIMES, Acting Chief Judge.

This is a petition for writ of certiorari to review a discovery order.

The petitioner (U.S. Fire) issued a blanket bond on behalf of the respondent (bank). The bank subsequently suffered a loss as a result of giving value to a customer for checks issued on a nonexistent bank in the West Indies. The bank made a claim for the loss under the bond. When U.S. Fire refused to pay the claim, the bank brought suit. In its complaint, the bank sought compensatory damages for its loss and punitive damages for U.S. Fire's "bad faith" in arbitrarily refusing to pay the claim. U.S. Fire's motion to strike the claim for punitive damages was denied.

The bank sought the production of various records from U.S. Fire. Over objection, the court entered an order compelling the production of records falling generally into two categories: (1) U.S. Fire's file involving the claim at issue in the lawsuit; and (2) U.S. Fire's files with respect to claims and lawsuits against U.S. Fire by third parties under similar blanket bonds. We hold that the order requiring the production of these records constituted a departure from the essential requirements of law from which there would be no adequate remedy by appeal. See Manatee County v. Estech General Chemicals Corp., 402 So.2d 75 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981).

In a bad faith suit against an insurance company for failure to settle within the policy limits, the plaintiff may obtain discovery of the original claim file. Stone v. Travelers Insurance Co., 326 So.2d 241 (Fla. 3d DCA 1976). On the other hand, the plaintiff cannot compel disclosure of the carrier's work product, its claim file, where the cause of action is a first party claim for coverage under the policy. Agri-Business v. Bridges, 397 So.2d 394 (Fla. 1st DCA 1981). The reason for the distinction is that a claim for bad faith will lie when a carrier fails properly to perform its fiduciary obligation to defend, but a claim for bad faith cannot be prosecuted where the parties simply disagree over whether the claim is covered by the policy. In the latter case, the parties occupy a debtor-creditor...

To continue reading

Request your trial
18 cases
  • Dunn v. National Sec. Fire and Cas. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 23 Diciembre 1993
    ...Continental Casualty Co. v. Aqua Jet Filter Systems, Inc., 620 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 3d DCA 1993); U.S. Fire Insurance Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982); Aaron v. Allstate Insurance Co., 559 So.2d 275 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 569 So.2d 1278 (Fla.1990); Koken v. Am......
  • Robinson v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 90-367
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 3 Julio 1991
    ...was no bad faith as a matter of law were incorrectly applied to the issue in the present case. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982) involved a discovery issue in a first-party insurance case. The court took pains to distinguish a cause o......
  • Fidelity and Cas. Ins. Co. of New York v. Taylor
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 29 Diciembre 1987
    ...599 (Fla.1976); American Fire & Casualty Co. v. Davis, 146 So.2d 615 (Fla. 1st DCA 1962); see also U.S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So.2d 783, 784 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). In those cases, like this one, the pertinent issue is the manner in which the company has handled the suit in......
  • Hartford Acc. & Indem. Co. v. U.S.C.P. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • 9 Septiembre 1987
    ...Milliken, 498 So.2d 495 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986); Solodky v. Wilson, 474 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985); United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). Regardless of the route taken, we cannot agree that certiorari is a proper vehicle for testing denia......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • The continuing story of certiorari.
    • United States
    • Florida Bar Journal Vol. 83 No. 11, December 2009
    • 1 Diciembre 2009
    ...(Fla. 2d D.C.A. 1986); Solodky v. Wilson, 474 So. 2d 1231 (Fla. 5th D.C.A. 1985); United States Fire Ins. Co. v. Clearwater Oaks Bank, 421 So. 2d 783 (Fla. 2d D.C.A. (14) Martin-Johnson, 509 So. 2d at 1099. (15) E.g., Eberhardt v. Eberhardt, 666 So. 2d 1024, 1025 (Fla. 4th D.C.A. 1996); Sho......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT