U.S. v. Hart
| Decision Date | 10 March 1983 |
| Docket Number | No. 82-2046,82-2046 |
| Citation | 701 F.2d 749 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Gary O. Booth, Richard D. Roller, and Barbara A. Shandony, Appellees, v. Douglas M. HART, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Glenn L. Archer, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Michael L. Paup, Carleton D. Powell, Joan I. Oppenheimer, Tax Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees; Rodney S. Webb, U.S. Atty., of counsel.
Douglas M. Hart, pro se.
Before HEANEY, McMILLIAN and ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.
The United States and three employees of the Internal Revenue Service brought this action for declaratory and injunctive relief against the defendant Douglas M. Hart. Booth is District Director of the Internal Revenue Service for the North Dakota District, Roller is a group manager, and Shandony is an examination and revenue agent. Roller assigned Shandony to audit the income-tax returns of the defendant Hart, who lives in West Fargo, North Dakota.
After the audit was completed, Hart filed in the office of the Register of Deeds for Richland County, North Dakota, documents styled "Common-law Liens," describing certain real property owned by the individual plaintiffs. Later, Hart filed in the office of the Register of Deeds of Cass County, North Dakota, a document styled "Sheriff's Posse Comitatus Common-law Great Charter," a writing purporting to state that the federal, state, county, and city governments are acting unconstitutionally, that the signers of the writing, including Hart, have a duty to protect and defend the Constitution of the United States and of North Dakota, that the signers have established a posse comitatus for the purpose of maintaining a republican form of government, and that the signers will be armed and have the lawful right to arrest without a warrant.
After a hearing, the District Court, 545 F.Supp 470, 1 held that the "Common-law Liens" and "Sheriff's Posse Comitatus Common-law Great Charter" are void and of no legal effect. It also enjoined Hart and all others in active concert with him from making arrests of or otherwise attempting to molest, hinder, or impede plaintiffs in the performance of their official duties.
Hart appeals to this Court. The principal argument presented in his brief is that the District Court lacked jurisdiction. The inferior federal courts, appellant asserts, have no "civil jurisdiction over a sovereign citizen." Brief for Appellant, p. 4. We disagree....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Snyder v. IRS
...costs for groundless actions involving the tax laws. See Parker v. Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Hart, 701 F.2d 749, 750 (8th Cir.1983); McCoy v. Commissioner, 696 F.2d 1234, 1237 (9th Under both general equitable principles and the provisions of Rule 11, this ......
-
Cameron v. IRS
...costs for groundless actions involving the tax laws. See Parker v. Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Hart, 701 F.2d 749, 750 (8th Cir.1983); McCoy v. Commissioner, 696 F.2d 1234, 1237 (9th Under both general equitable principles and the provisions of Rule 11, this ......
-
Young v. IRS
...costs for groundless actions involving the tax laws. See Parker v. Commissioner, 724 F.2d 469 (5th Cir.1984); United States v. Hart, 701 F.2d 749, 750 (8th Cir.1983); McCoy v. Commissioner, 696 F.2d 1234, 1237 (9th Under both general equitable principles and the provisions of Rule 11, this ......
-
US v. Bailey
...of injunctions and other orders where necessary or appropriate to enforce the internal revenue laws. See, e.g., United States v. Hart, 701 F.2d 749, 750 (8th Cir.1983) (to enjoin an individual's harassment of Internal Revenue Service agents pursuant to section 7402(a)); United States v. Lan......
-
CHAPTER 11 NON-RECORD TITLE CONSIDERATIONS
...Field, 384 F.2d 829 (10th Cir. 1967). [222] 53 C.J.S. Liens § 2 (1987) citing United States v. Hart, 545 F.Supp. 470 (D.N.D. 1982), aff'd 701 F.2d 749 (8th Cir. 1983). [223] See Section III, paragraph C.2. supra for a discussion of operating agreement lien provisions. [224] See, e.g., Manua......