Ulland v. State

Decision Date28 March 2012
Docket NumberNo. 1D12–1177.,1D12–1177.
Citation135 So.3d 298
PartiesGarry A. ULLAND, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

Garry A. Ulland, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

DISMISSED. Cf. Baker v. State, 878 So.2d 1236 (Fla.2004) (reiterating that the extraordinary writ of habeas relief cannot be used to litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in postconviction motions).

ROBERTS, CLARK, and SWANSON, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Ulland v. Comerford
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Florida
    • April 26, 2016
    ...litigate issues that could have been or were raised on direct appeal or in post-conviction motions) (Exs. M, PD2). Ulland v. State, 135 So. 3d 298 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012) (Mem). The First DCA denied Petitioner's motion for rehearing on May 24, 2012 (id.). On March 21, 2012, Petitioner filed a m......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT