Ullmann v. Land
Decision Date | 10 December 1904 |
Citation | 84 S.W. 294 |
Parties | ULLMANN v. LAND.<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Wise County; J. W. Patterson, Judge.
Action for broker's commission by W. H. Land against J. Ullmann. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Affirmed.
R. E. Carswell, for appellant. T. J. McMurray, for appellee.
Appellee sued appellant in the district court of Wise county, alleging that the latter was the owner of certain described real estate situated in that county, consisting of 130 acres out of the Edward Stephens survey, which he was desirous of selling, and, to that end, employed appellee to find a purchaser and sell same for him. That appellant valued said land at $6 per acre, and agreed and promised appellee to give as compensation for finding a purchaser and selling said land all over the sum of $6 per acre that he could get for it, to be agreed on between the purchaser, appellant, and appellee. That he at once set about to find a purchaser for said land, which resulted in discovering one John M. Green, who was willing to purchase the same, and who did purchase the same, upon the following terms, viz.: It was further alleged that the Green land was worth at least $1,250 cash, and the said notes well worth $350, and that appellant was not entitled, under the contract, to more than $780. There was prayer...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Mecum v. Metz
... ... the agreement was one of association and not a contract to ... convey; locations of mineral ground upon public land are of ... course property, 18 R. C. L. 1152; Mount Rosa v. Palmer, ... (Colo.) 77 Am. St. Rep. 245, but the transaction was not ... a sale; words ... ...
-
Morriss-Buick Co. v. Huss
...190 S. W. 1165; 18 Tex. Jur. 471, and authorities cited in note; Thornton v. Moody (Tex. Civ. App.) 24 S. W. 331; Ullmann v. Land, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 422, 84 S. W. 294; 23 C. J. 185; 23 R. C. L. What was the consideration paid for the car? Was it the $825, represented by the note and the fai......
-
Webb v. Harding
...181 Mass. 485, 63 N. E. 1068; Blair v. Slosson, 27 Tex. Civ. App. 403, 66 S. W. 112, and authorities there cited; Ullmann v. Land, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 422, 84 S. W. 294; Hamburger v. Thomas, 118 S. W. 770; Loomis v. Broaddus, 134 S. W. 746; Pierce v. Nichols, 50 Tex. Civ. App. 443, 110 S. W. ......
-
Bailey v. Rowe
...for their services. Crowley Co. v. Myers, 69 N.J.L. 245, 55 A. 305; Giles v. Swift, 170 Mass. 461, 49 N.E. 737; Ullmann v. Land, 37 Tex. Civ. App. 422, 84 S.W. 294; Stewart v. Fowler, 53 Kan. 537, 36 P. 1002. ¶11 It is a well-settled principle of law that, where a broker has performed his u......