Unc Ardco, Inc. v. Luckner
| Decision Date | 27 November 1996 |
| Docket Number | No. 96-1413,96-1413 |
| Citation | 685 So.2d 29 |
| Parties | 21 Fla. L. Weekly D2539 UNC ARDCO, INC. and Unc, Inc., Appellants, v. Evelyn LUCKNER, Appellee. |
| Court | Florida District Court of Appeals |
Dee Dee Fischer and Ronald P. Weil of Aragon, Burlington, Weil & Crockett, P.A., Miami, for appellants.
Robyn S. Hankins and Karen Coolman Amlong of Amlong & Amlong, P.A., Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.
The appellants, Unc, Inc. ("Unc"), a Delaware corporation and Unc Ardco, Inc. ("Unc Ardco"), a separately-incorporated subsidiary of Unc, appeal a non-final order denying Unc's motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. We reverse as to appellant Unc because the plaintiff failed to adequately respond to Unc's denial of her jurisdictional allegations. We affirm as to appellant Unc Ardco because Unc Ardco did not challenge the plaintiff's jurisdictional allegations.
Evelyn Luckner, the plaintiff below, sued Unc and Unc Ardco under Florida's Whistleblower's Act, sections 448.101-.102, Florida Statutes (1993), alleging that she was terminated from her employment with Unc "and/or" Unc Ardco in retaliation for having reported to Unc certain unlawful business practices by Unc Ardco. The trial court denied Unc's motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction.
JURISDICTION OVER UNC, INC.
The second amended complaint alleges that Unc is subject to suit in Florida on two separate grounds under Florida's Long Arm Statute: (1) Unc allegedly conducts business in Florida; and (2) it allegedly committed a tortious act in Florida; specifically, it sent its Human Resources Director to Florida to wrongfully terminate the plaintiff. See § 48.193(1)(a), (b), Fla.Stat. (1993). In compliance with the procedure laid out in Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla.1989), Unc filed an affidavit disputing these jurisdictional allegations. In particular, the affidavit of Unc's Vice President, Richard H. Lange, denied that Unc does any business in Florida or that it had employed the plaintiff.
Once Unc had properly disputed the plaintiff's allegations, the burden shifted back to the plaintiff to assert, by affidavit, the basis for personal jurisdiction. Id.; Votaw v. Watkins, 660 So.2d 1171, 1172 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The plaintiff's presentation to the trial court of two unauthenticated paychecks purportedly issued from Unc to the plaintiff was insufficient to meet this burden. Therefore, the trial court erred in denying Unc's motion to dismiss. See Votaw, 660 So.2d at 1172.
JURISDICTION OVER UNC ARDCO, INC.
Unlike Unc, Unc Ardco did not move below to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction. Nor did the affidavit of Unc's Vice President deny Unc Ardco's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Washington Capital Corp. v. Milandco, Ltd., Inc.
...or other sworn statement, refute the proof in the defendant's affidavit. Venetian Salami, 554 So.2d at 502; Unc Ardco, Inc. v. Luckner, 685 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Gemini Equities, 650 So.2d at 1110. The failure of a plaintiff to refute the allegations of the defendant's affidavit req......
-
ARI Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hogen, 98-2075.
... ... However, Hogen, in opposition, cites to Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. Pavarini Construction Co., 425 So.2d 1212 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), a decision of the Fourth ... ...
-
GeoStar v. Weinstein, 4D99-1417.
...by legally sufficient facts. Id. at 841; Venetian Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d 499, 502 (Fla.1989); Unc Ardco, Inc. v. Luckner, 685 So.2d 29, 30 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996); Lampe v. Hoyne, 652 So.2d 424, 425 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995); Tobacco Merchants Ass'n of U.S. v. Broin, 657 So.2d 939, 941 n.......
-
BELZ INVESTCO v. GICSA
...Salami Co. v. Parthenais, 554 So.2d at 502; Washington Capital Corp. v. Milandco, Ltd., Inc., 695 So.2d at 841; Unc Ardco, Inc. v. Luckner, 685 So.2d 29 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996). The trial court can resolve the jurisdictional question solely on the basis of the affidavits, so long as they do not......