Unclaimed Property Recovery Service, Inc. v. Ubs Painewebber Inc.

Decision Date20 January 2009
Docket Number5072.
Citation870 N.Y.S.2d 361,58 A.D.3d 526,2009 NY Slip Op 00257
PartiesUNCLAIMED PROPERTY RECOVERY SERVICE, INC., Appellant, v. UBS PAINEWEBBER INC., Respondent.
CourtNew York Supreme Court — Appellate Division

The breach of contract cause of action was properly dismissed since the parties' agreement, which provided that defendant would pay plaintiff a fee of ten percent of all unclaimed property recovered, neither specified the "nature of the property" nor "disclose[d] the name and address of the holder" (Abandoned Property Law § 1416 [1] [b], [c]). The court properly refused to incorporate by reference a 36-page list of properties held by the New York State Office of Unclaimed Funds, as the list was not "referred to and described in the instrument as issued so as to identify the referenced document `beyond all reasonable doubt'" (Shark Information Servs. Corp. v Crum & Forster Commercial Ins., 222 AD2d 251, 252 [1995], quoting Matter of Board of Commrs. of Washington Park of City of Albany, 52 NY 131, 134 [1873]), and the agreement contained a merger clause. The court also properly did not admit the list as parol evidence since the agreement was "complete and clear and unambiguous upon its face" (W.W.W. Assoc. v Giancontieri, 77 NY2d 157, 163 [1990] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]).

Dismissal of the unjust enrichment claim was appropriate as it was duplicative of the breach of contract cause of action (see Unclaimed Prop. Recovery Serv., Inc. v Chase Manhattan Bank, 25 AD3d 688, 689 [2006], lv denied 7 NY3d 713 [2006]). In the absence of a claim establishing underlying liability, the account stated claim was not viable (see M. Paladino, Inc. v Lucchese & Son Contr. Corp., 247 AD2d 515, 516 [1998]).

Concur—Mazzarelli, J.P., Friedman, Buckley, Acosta and Freedman, JJ.

To continue reading

Request your trial
17 cases
  • Fuller & D'Angelo, P.C. v. Cornerstone Hospitality Advisors
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • September 15, 2011
    ...Corp., 4 N.Y.3d 272, 278 (2005); R/S Assoc. v. New York Job Dev. Auth., 98 N.Y.2d 29, 33(2002); Unclaimed Prop. Recovery Serv., Inc. v. UBS Paine Webber Inc., 58 A.D.3d 526 (1st Dep't 2009); Riverside S. Planning Corp. v. CRP/Extell Riverside, L.P., 60 A.D.3d 61, 66 (1st Dep't 2008), and th......
  • Michael R. Gianatasio, PE, P.C. v. City of N.Y.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court
    • August 26, 2016
    ...is not maintainable “[i]n the absence of a claim establishing underlying liability.” Unclaimed Prop. Recovery Serv., Inc. v. UBS PaineWebber Inc., 58 A.D.3d 526, 870 N.Y.S.2d 361 (1st Dept.2009), citing M. Paladino, Inc. v. J. Lucchese & Son Contracting Corp., 247 A.D.2d 515, 516, 669 N.Y.S......
  • Zim Am. Integrated Shipping Servs. Co. v. Sportswear Grp., LLC
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York
    • July 27, 2021
    ...Ltd. v. SP Aircraft Owner I, LLC , 637 F. Supp. 2d 185, 197 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) (quoting Unclaimed Property Recovery Serv., Inc. v. UBS PaineWebber Inc. , 58 A.D.3d 526, 870 N.Y.S.2d 361, 362 (1st Dep't 2009) ); see Grinnell v. Ultimate Realty, LLC , 38 A.D.3d 600, 832 N.Y.S.2d 244, 245 (2d Dep......
  • Sabre Int'l Sec., Ltd. v. Vulcan Capital Mgmt., Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • May 3, 2012
    ...Inc. v. H & M Int'l. Transp., Inc., 171 A.D.2d 479, 485, 567 N.Y.S.2d 404 [1991];see also Unclaimed Prop. Recovery Serv., Inc. v. UBS PaineWebber Inc., 58 A.D.3d 526, 870 N.Y.S.2d 361 [2009] ). “[A]llegedly unfulfilled contractual conditions precedent to [a] defendant's payment obligation n......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT