Union Bank v. Baudin, 90-1061
| Court | Court of Appeal of Louisiana (US) |
| Citation | 598 So.2d 689 |
| Docket Number | No. 90-1061,90-1061 |
| Parties | The UNION BANK, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Malcolm BAUDIN, Defendant-Appellee. |
| Decision Date | 16 April 1992 |
Page 689
v.
Malcolm BAUDIN, Defendant-Appellee.
Third Circuit.
Page 690
Michael J. Johnson, Keith Manuel, Marksville, for defendant/appellant.
J.B. Treuting, Marksville, for plaintiff/appellee.
Before DOUCET and YELVERTON, JJ., and COREIL *, J. Pro Tem.
JOSEPH E. COREIL, Judge Pro Tem.
The Union Bank filed suit to enjoin Malcolm Baudin from impeding free passage along a gravel road named Nicole Drive located in Marksville, Louisiana. The court below adjudged Nicole Drive a public road. In so ruling, the trial court enjoined defendant, Malcolm Baudin, from impeding public passage at any point along Nicole Drive. Baudin did not timely appeal the injunction; however, Baudin appeals the decree holding Nicole Drive a public road. We affirm the trial court's ruling.
FACTS
Malcolm Baudin owned a large tract of land in Avoyelles Parish. He subdivided a portion of that tract and, on May 17, 1983, a plat of survey was made. It was recorded in the public records of Avoyelles Parish, illustrating the property in question. The public record states, "Plat of Survey--showing parcels of land divided, as instructed for Mac Baudin, said parcels to be sold at a later date." The public record declared that Nicole Drive provided access to lot "D." A copy of that survey is reproduced as follows:
NOTE: OPINION CONTAINS TABLE OR OTHER DATA THAT IS NOT VIEWABLE
Page 692
Lot "D" was owned by Bryan I. Dauzat and Melanie Baudin Dauzat. Melanie is the daughter of the defendant herein. Lot "D" is situated at the end of Nicole Drive and is one of two tracts listed as lots purportedly sold to Melanie and Bryan Dauzat for "$100.00 and other valuable consideration" by act of sale from Malcolm Baudin, dated May 19, 1983 and recorded in the records of Avoyelles Parish, Louisiana.
On June 14, 1983, Melanie and Bryan Dauzat executed an act of mortgage on Lot "D" in favor of the Union Bank. They defaulted, and Union Bank filed a petition for executory process against the Dauzats on February 1, 1990. Union Bank was appointed "keeper" of the property during the pendency of the Executory Proceedings 1.
On April 18, 1990, Union Bank filed a petition for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction alleging that Malcolm Baudin obstructed free passage on Nicole Drive by constructing a cable across the width of the roadway. The petition further alleges that Nicole Drive is a public road dedicated by Malcolm Baudin.
After a hearing, the court found Nicole Drive to be a public road by reason of statutory, or at least implied, dedication and enjoined Malcolm Baudin.
Baudin appeals only the decree holding Nicole Drive to be a public road. He contends that he never intended the roadway to be a public thoroughfare, but a private drive where he and his children were to reside.
DISCUSSION
Did the recordation of the Baudin plat effect a statutory dedication of the road in question?
The dedication of a road may be accomplished in four ways: "formal dedication," "statutory dedication," "implied dedication," and "tacit dedication." This case concerns the "statutory dedication."
STATUTORY DEDICATION
The statute relied upon is as follows:
"Sec. 5051. Platting land into squares or lots before sale; filing map of land; limitations on dedications
A. Whenever the owner of any real estate desires to lay off the same into squares or lots with streets or alleys between the squares or lots and with the intention of selling or offering for sale any of the squares or lots, he shall, before selling any square or lot or any portion of same:
(1) Cause the real estate to be surveyed and platted or subdivided by a licensed land surveyor into lots or blocks, or both, each designated by number.
(2) Set stakes, which shall be permanent in nature, at all of the corners of every lot and block thereof, properly marked so as to designate the correct number of each lot and block.
(3) Write the legal description of the land on the plat or map, and cause to be made and filed in the office of the keeper of notarial records of the parish wherein the property is situated and copied into the conveyance record book of such parish, and a duplicate...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
98-379 La.App. 3 Cir. 10/28/98, Braxton v. Guillory
...dedication may exist even though there is no language in the plat formally dedicating lands to public use. Union Bank v. Baudin, 598 So.2d 689 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992). However, this is not a Section 5051 Implied dedication is a common law doctrine recognized by the courts of this state. Collin......
-
Braxton v. Guillory, 98-379.
...dedication may exist even though there is no language in the plat formally dedicating lands to public use. Union Bank v. Baudin, 598 So.2d 689 (La.App. 3 Cir.1992). However, this is not a Section 5051 Implied dedication is a common law doctrine recognized by the courts of this state. Collin......
-
Rachal v. Avoyelles Parish Police Jury, CA 22-17
...the filing of plats and the recordation of a formal dedication of all 339 So.3d 699 the streets to public use. Union Bank v. Baudin , 598 So.2d 689, 693 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992). This is known as statutory dedication. The jurisprudence is well settled that a statutory dedication vests ownersh......
-
96-2507 La.App. 1 Cir. 3/13/98, Melancon v. Giglio
...duties, including the filing of plats and the recordation of a formal dedication of all the streets to public use. Union Bank v. Baudin, 598 So.2d 689, 693 (La.App. 3rd Cir.1992). This is known as statutory dedication. The jurisprudence is well settled that a statutory dedication vests owne......