Union Cent. Life Ins. Co. v. Moreland

Decision Date01 May 1900
Citation56 S.W. 653
PartiesUNION CENT. LIFE INS. CO. v. MORELAND. [1]
CourtKentucky Court of Appeals

Appeal from circuit court, Scott county.

"Not to be officially reported."

Action by Carrie Moreland against the Union Central Life Insurance Company on a policy of life insurance. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals. Affirmed.

Robt. Ramsey, H. P. Montgomery, and Maxwell & Ramsey, for appellant.

Jas. F. Askew and Owens & Finnell, for appellee.

HAZELRIGG, C.J.

On a former appeal of this case (46 S.W. 516) it was held that if the company, as charged in the plaintiff's reply, retained the note for the unearned premiums after its maturity, and insisted on its payment in full, it waived the forfeiture provided for in the policy. On a return of the case, these issues of fact were made by the company's rejoinder to the reply of the plaintiff. The proof conduced to sustain the averment of the reply. Confessedly, the company retained the note, and in sending it to its attorney for collection treated it as a subsisting obligation,--a fact consistent only with an intention to waive the forfeiture of the policy. We cannot agree with counsel that this act of retention, and the effort to collect the note, were the acts of an unauthorized individual, rather than the acts of the company. The proof is otherwise. We think the trial proceeded in accordance with the principles announced on the former appeal, and the judgment must be affirmed.

---------

Notes:

[1] Reported by Edward W. Hines, Esq., of the Frankfort bar, and formerly state reporter.

---------

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Barber v. Hartford Life Ins. Company
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Missouri
    • July 9, 1919
    ...... Hartford Life Insurance Company in Missouri were subject to. the two per cent tax upon all premiums collected in the. State. Sec. 7068, R. S. 1909, as construed by the trial. ...Mutual, etc., Ins. Co., 75 F. 65; Murray v. Home Benefit Life Assn., 90 Cal. 402;. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 17 Ind.App. 592; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Woods, 11. .App. 335; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Spinks, . 119 Ky. 261; Moreland v. Union Central Life Ins. Co., 104 Ky. 129; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Moreland, 56 S.W. ......
  • St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Cooper
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oklahoma
    • November 9, 1909
    ......App. 598; Insurance Co. v. Bowen, 40 Mich. 149; Insurance Co. v. Moreland" (Ky.) 56 S.W. 653; Insurance Co. v. Reppond (Tex.) 81 S.W. 1012.     \xC2"......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT