Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Boggs

Decision Date15 January 1934
Docket Number4-3290
PartiesUNION CENTRAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BOGGS
CourtArkansas Supreme Court

Appeal from Cleveland Circuit Court; Patrick Henry, Judge; affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Buzbee Harrison, Buzbee & Wright, for appellant.

Woodson Mosley and R. W. Wilson, for appellee.

OPINION

BUTLER, J.

The appellee, a guardian of an insane person, brought suit against the appellant insurance company to recover disability benefits under a clause in the contract of insurance issued by said company to the ward of the appellee. An answer was filed to the complaint and various motions made and proceedings taken, when finally the appellee, by amendment to the complaint, alleged that she and the appellant, pending the litigation, had agreed upon a settlement of the controversy by which she was to be paid by the appellant a stipulated sum in full settlement of all demands which then existed or might thereafter arise under the policy, upon her execution and delivery to the appellant of a "valid, binding and unimpeachable release," and the delivery to the insurer of the policy for cancellation; that she had complied with the terms of the agreement, but that the appellant had failed to settle according to the agreement. She prayed for judgment.

To the complaint, as amended, the appellant tendered its answer, admitting the agreement, but alleging that the appellant was without authority to execute and deliver a release of the nature and effect agreed upon. Appellant denied that appellee had executed and tendered any such release, and admitted its willingness to carry into effect the agreement upon the performance by the appellee of her part of the agreement, namely, that she would execute and deliver a valid, binding and unimpeachable release.

On the issues thus joined on the complaint as finally amended and the amended answer thereto, the cause came on to be heard, and by express agreement of the parties, a jury was waived and the cause submitted to the court sitting as a jury. The court, after having heard the evidence, refused the findings of fact and declarations of law requested by the appellant and rendered judgment in favor of the appellee, basing the same on the findings of fact and declarations of law requested by appellee, as follows:

"I. The court finds that on the 6th day of September, 1930 Victor James Boggs was duly adjudicated insane by a proper order of the probate court of Cleveland County, and that his wife, Elizabeth McMurtrey Boggs, was appointed by said court as his guardian; that she is now the duly appointed, qualified and acting guardian of Victor James Boggs; that as guardian of Victor James Boggs, she had authority to compromise, for a valuable consideration, his claim and suit against the defendant, the Union Central Life Insurance Company, upon such terms and conditions as might be agreed upon between her and said Union Central Life Insurance Company, provided such compromise agreement was made in good faith and not in fraud of the rights of her ward, Victor James Boggs.

"II. The court finds that the compromise agreement made between the plaintiff, Elizabeth McMurtrey Boggs, and the defendant, the Union Central Life Insurance Company, which was reduced to writing and signed by the parties, a copy of which is attached as exhibit A to the amendment to plaintiff's amended complaint and the original of which was introduced in evidence in this cause as exhibit 1 to plaintiff's testimony, was made in good faith and is not in fraud of the rights of plaintiff's ward, Victor James Boggs, but, on the contrary, is to the best interests of the said ward and his estate.

"III. The court finds that said agreement of compromise was effective to obligate the defendant, the Union Central Life Insurance Company, to pay to the plaintiff, Elizabeth McMurtrey Boggs, as guardian of Victor James Boggs, the sum of $ 4,000, upon the execution and delivery by said guardian to the Union Central Life Insurance Company of a valid, binding and unimpeachable release, fully and finally releasing and discharging the defendant of all liability, causes of action, claims and demands of every name and nature now existing or which might arise hereafter under the insurance contract effected by the defendant on the life of Victor James Boggs on the 22d day of March, 1921, and the policy of life insurance issued pursuant thereto, being No. 683,532, a copy of which is attached as exhibit A to the memorandum of agreement to compromise introduced in evidence and upon the surrender to the defendant of said policy of life insurance for cancellation and final extinguishment of all its liability thereon.

"IV. The court finds that, pursuant to the agreement of compromise sued on and introduced in evidence, Elizabeth McMurtrey Boggs, as guardian of Victor James Boggs, duly executed and tendered to the defendant, the Union Central Life Insurance Company, a valid, binding and unimpeachable release a true copy of which was attached as exhibit B to the amendment to plaintiff's amended complaint and introduced in evidence as exhibit 4 to plaintiff's testimony. The court further finds that said instrument of release is efficient to consummate and make effective for all time the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • State ex rel. Bovard v. Weill
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 5 Septiembre 1944
    ... ... Marcel Weill and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a Corporation No. 38843Supreme Court ... Jur., pp ... 49, 68; Maclay v. Equitable Life Ins. Society, 152 ... U.S. 499, 14 S.Ct. 678; ... 430, 53 S.Ct. 415; Hayes v. Insurance Co., 125 Ill ... 126, 18 N.E. 322, 1 L.R.A ... 1075, 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) ... 1123; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Boggs, 188 Ark ... ...
  • State ex rel. Bovard v. Weill
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 5 Septiembre 1944
    ... ... MARCEL WEILL and FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND, a Corporation ... No. 38843 ... Jur., pp. 49, 68; Maclay v. Equitable Life Ins. Society, 152 U.S. 499, 14 S. Ct. 678; Spicer ... 430, 53 S. Ct. 415; Hayes v. Insurance Co., 125 Ill. 126, 18 N.E. 322, 1 L.R.A. 303; ... 492, 94 N.E. 1075, 35 L.R.A. (N.S.) 1123; Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. Boggs, 188 Ark. 604, 66 ... ...
  • Boyd v. Larco-Industrial Painting Corporation, FS-71-C-60.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Western District of Arkansas
    • 9 Abril 1973
    ... ... Hammond, d/b/a Boyd-Hammond Contracting Company, a partnership, Plaintiffs, ... LARCO-INDUSTRIAL ... , a corporation, and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, a corporation, Defendants ... No ... Partain, 193 Ark. 803, 807, 103 S.W.2d 53; Union Central Life Insurance Company v. Boggs, 188 Ark ... ...
  • Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Partain
    • United States
    • Arkansas Supreme Court
    • 15 Marzo 1937
    ... ... 79 Ark. 252, 96 S.W. 374; Union Central Life Ins ... Co. v. Boggs, 188 Ark ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT