Union P. Ry. Co. v. Sternberg
| Decision Date | 26 June 1889 |
| Citation | 21 P. 1021,13 Colo. 141 |
| Parties | UNION PAC. RY. CO. v. STERNBERG. |
| Court | Colorado Supreme Court |
Commissioners' decision. Appeal from Boulder county court.
Action for damages to stock, brought by D. K. Sternberg against the Union Pacific Railway Company. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff on appeal to the county court, and defendant appeals.
Teller & Orahood and E. R French, for appellant.
D Bartlett, for appellee.
This suit was brought before a justice of the peace to recover the value of a heifer said to have been worth $75, killed or injured by a train of defendant. A bill or account was filed with the justice of the peace, but no complaint in writing. The defendant entered a special appearance, and filed what was called a 'plea and motion,' in the nature of a plea in abatement, which was overruled. Trial proceeded ex parte, and judgment for plaintiff for $125 and costs amounting to $28.30. An appeal was taken to the county court, where the same plea and motion was interposed, and it was there overruled. Defendant excepted to the ruling, and a bill of exceptions was signed. The trial proceeded before a jury of three. Some testimony was given on the part of plaintiff, and the witnesses cross-examined by defendant, but no testimony offered on the part of the defendant. Verdict for the plaintiff for $151. Motion in arrest of judgment and for a new trial, which was overruled, and judgment on the verdict.
This suit was instituted under chapter 93, div. 5, Gen. St. No proof of negligence was offered, and no attempt to enforce the remedy at common law. To recover under the statute plaintiff was required to make proof of compliance with the provisions of section 3 in regard to loss, ownership, and appraisement of value of the animal before the commencement of the suit. Railway Co. v. Henderson, 10 Colo. 1, 13 P. 910. On the day of the second trial (in the county court) plaintiff was allowed to amend the bill or account filed by adding $50 for the burning over of grass land. This was a new cause of action, requiring different proof and a different defense from the original statutory action. It was error to allow it. Givens v. Wheeler, 5 Colo. 598. The court also erred in overruling defendant's motion for a nonsuit. The evidence was clearly insufficient to warrant the jury in finding a verdict. It was not a question of weight or preponderance of evidence, but an utter want of evidence on...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Anthony v. Slayden
... ... Cole v. Smith ... (Colo. Sup.) 58 P. 1086, and authorities cited; Givens v ... Wheeler, 6 Colo. 149; Railway Co. v. Sternberg, 13 Colo. 141, ... 21 P. 1021; Ogden v. Moore, 95 Mich. 290, 54 N.W. 899; ... Oglesby v. Attrill (C. C.) 14 F. 214; Pratt v. Bacon, 10 ... Pick ... ...
-
Kindel v. Le Bert
...in the majority of the states which have adopted the reformed code of procedure. Givens v. Wheeler, 6 Colo. 149; Railway Co. v. Sternberg, 13 Colo. 141, 21 P. 1021; Davis Johnson, 4 Colo.App. 545, 36 P. 887. In another view, the refusal of the district court to allow to be filed this amende......
-
Thompson v. White
...in the original complaint from a legal to an equitable one, or vice versa. Givens v. Wheeler, 5 Colo. 598, 6 Colo. 149; Railway Co. v. Sternberg, 13 Colo. 141, 21 P. 1021. if a new cause of action was not set up in the replication, there is an entire absence of evidence to sustain it. By fa......
-
Brown v. Potter
...v. Fiske, 4 Colo. 24; Guldager v. Rockwell, 14 Colo. 459, 24 P. 556; Railroad Co. v. Budin, 6 Colo.App. 275, 40 P. 503; Railway Co. v. Sternberg, 13 Colo. 141, 21 P. 1021; v. Railroad Co., 7 Colo.App. 126, 42 P. 602. Starting with this conclusion respecting the facts, and the accuracy of th......