Union Trust Co. v. Soderer

Decision Date18 February 1903
Citation171 Mo. 675,72 S.W. 499
PartiesUNION TRUST CO. v. SODERER et al.
CourtMissouri Supreme Court

Appeal from St. Louis circuit court; Wm. Zachritz, Judge.

Action by the Union Trust Company, as administrator pendente lite of Alois Soderer, against Caroline Soderer and others. From a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

During a contest of the alleged will of Alois Soderer, the plaintiff was appointed by the probate court administrator pendente lite of the estate. This suit was begun in the circuit court by the plaintiff in that capacity to recover of the defendants personal property and real estate which the petition alleges belonged to the estate and came into the hands of defendants as trustees under the will. The petition alleges that personal property of the value of $5,800, belonging to the estate, was turned over to the defendants by the executrix before the plaintiff's appointment as administrator p. l., and is now held by them, and also several parcels of real estate, which are rented, and from which the defendants are collecting rents to the amount of $1,000 a month; that defendants claim the right to hold this personal property and real estate, and collect their rents, by virtue of the will, under which they are appointed trustees; that plaintiff has demanded possession of the personal property and real estate, and an account of the rents collected, but defendants have refused to render the same. The prayer is for a decree for possession, an accounting, an injunction from interfering with plaintiff's management of the estate, etc. Defendants demurred to the petition. The court sustained the demurrer, and plaintiff declined to plead further. There was a final judgment for defendants, and the plaintiff appeals.

Joseph W. Lewis, for appellant. H. A. Loevy and Geo. W. Lubke, for respondents.

VALLIANT, J. (after stating the facts).

The plaintiff is, of course, entitled to possession of all the personal property belonging to the estate. The petition alleges that before the plaintiff's appointment the executrix turned over to the defendants personal property belonging to the estate to the value of $5,800, and that defendants still hold the same. But the petition does not state of what that personalty consisted, and therefore there is no issue tendered as to personal property. There could be no valid judgment against the defendants for personal property when the property is not described, and there could be no description in the judgment if there is none in the petition. It was not error, therefore, to sustain the demurrer to the petition regarding it as a demand for personal property.

The main point in dispute, however, as we judge from the briefs before us, is as to the right of the administrator pendente lite to the possession of the real estate owned by the deceased at the time of his death. All our law on the subject of the office of administrator pendente lite is contained in the following statute (Section 13, Rev. St. 1899): "If the validity of a will be contested, or the executor be a minor or absent from the state, letters of administration shall be granted during the time of such contest, minority or absence to some other person, who shall take charge of the property, and administer the same according to law, under the discretion of the court, and account for and pay and deliver all the money and property of the estate to the executor or regular administrator, when qualified to act." The commission that that statute authorizes to be issued is "letters of administration." Those letters are to be issued by the probate court. The duties of the person to whom the letters are issued are to take charge of the property, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Odom v. Langston
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 27 août 1943
    ... ... property and retain possession of the same by virtue of the ... trust agreement, and would therefore be in the dual position ... of both plaintiffs and defendants or ... these being the duty to collect and preserve the estate ... Union Trust Co. v. Soderer, 171 Mo. 675, 679, 72 ... S.W. 499, 500; Seibert v. Harden, 319 Mo. 1105, ... ...
  • Leahy v. Mercantile Trust Company
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 30 décembre 1922
    ... ... We have ... ruled that an administrator pendente lite has no ... right to make distribution. [Union Trust Co. v. Soderer, 171 ... Mo. l. c. 675, 72 S.W. 499.] He holds and preserves the ... estate, and in emergencies, under order of court, may ... ...
  • Seibert v. Harden
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 18 mai 1928
    ...ruled correctly. Some of the language used is criticized in the case of the Union Trust Co. v. Soderer, 171 Mo. 675, l. c. 681. In the Union Trust Co. case, the plaintiff as administrator pendente instituted suit against the defendants to recover real estate which the petition alleged belon......
  • Seibert v. Harden
    • United States
    • Missouri Supreme Court
    • 18 mai 1928
    ...and the probate court so ordered, the case was ruled correctly. Some of the language used is criticized in the case of the Union Trust Co. v. Soderer, 171 Mo. 675, l.c. 681. In the Union Trust Co. case, the plaintiff as administrator pendente lite instituted suit against the defendants to r......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT