United Electric Ry. Co. v. Shelton

Decision Date07 December 1890
CitationUnited Electric Ry. Co. v. Shelton, 14 S.W. 863 (Tenn. 1890)
CourtTennessee Supreme Court
PartiesUNITED ELECTRIC RY. CO. <I>et al.</I> v. SHELTON.

Steger, Washington & Jackson and Vertrees & Vertrees, for appellants.John L. Nolen, for appellee.

TURNEY, C. J.

Shelton's horse was killed by coming in contact with a wire of the telegraph and telephone company, which had fallen across the trolley wire of the electric railway company.The wire of the telephone company had become much impaired.The falling of a wall of a burning building broke a pole of the telephone company, breaking the wires at several points.At the point of the accident, the telephone wires crossed the railway track above the trolley.A broken wire fell across the trolley wire, and, while resting on it, the horse came in contact with it, and was instantly killed.There was no guard wire over the trolley wire.The case was tried by the circuit judge without the intervention of a jury.The condition of the telephone wire was such as to arrest the attention of a prudent man engaged in the business of either company.The circuit judge found, under the facts, that both companies were...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
20 cases
  • Alabama Power Co. v. McIntosh
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 25, 1929
    ... ... city of Montgomery ... There ... were electric floor connections for the purpose of operating ... office fixtures ... The ... v. Siler, 229 Ill. 390, ... 82 N.E. 362, 15 L. R. A. (N. S.) 819, 11 Ann. Cas. 368; ... United Electric Co. v. Shelton, 89 Tenn. 423, 14 ... S.W. 863; Krenmayer v. St. Louis Trans. Co., 220 Mo ... ...
  • Galveston, H. & S. A. Ry. Co. v. Croskell
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • January 10, 1894
    ...R. Cas. 1, and note; Railroad Co. v. Dorsey, 25 Am. & Eng. R. Cas. 446; Railway Co. v. Jones, 75 Tex. 151, 12 S. W. 972; Railway Co. v. Shelton, (Tenn.) 14 S. W. 863; Colegrove v. Railroad Co., 20 N. Y. 492; Sellars v. Railroad Co., 25 Am. & Eng. R. Cas. 457, note; Patt. Ry. Acc. Law, p. 41......
  • Freeman v. Missouri & K. Telephone Co.
    • United States
    • Missouri Court of Appeals
    • January 9, 1912
    ...v. Ware, 115 Ky. 581, 74 S. W. 289, 24 Ky. Law Rep. 2519; Light Co. v. Miller, 203 Ill. 518, 68 N. E. 72; Electric Co. v. Shelton, 89 Tenn. 423, 14 S. W. 863, 24 Am. St. Rep. 614; Telegraph Co. v. State, 82 Md. 293, 33 Atl. 763, 31 L. R. A. 572, 51 Am. St. Rep. Later we shall discuss the su......
  • Cooley v. Pub. Serv. Co.
    • United States
    • New Hampshire Supreme Court
    • January 2, 1940
    ...of electrical construction, it was supposed to be good practice to maintain guards in such a position. Electric Ry. Company v. Shelton, 89 Tenn. 423, 14 S.W. 863, 24 Am.St.Rep. 614; Western Union Tel. Company v. Thorn, 3 Cir., 64 F. 287; State v. Jonesville St. Ry. Company, 87 Wis. 72, 57 N......
  • Get Started for Free