United States Fidelity & Guar. Co. v. Bullard Gin & M. Co.
Decision Date | 30 November 1922 |
Docket Number | (No. 2655.) |
Citation | 245 S.W. 720 |
Parties | UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. BULLARD GIN & MILL CO. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Suit by the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company against the Bullard Gin & Mill Company. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error. Affirmed.
The United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company issued and delivered to the Bullard Gin & Mill Company, a private corporation, two policies of insurance, called "workmen's compensation and employers' liability policies," one dated September 3, 1918, which expired at midnight of September 3, 1919, and another dated September 3, 1919, which expired at midnight of September 3, 1920. The policies compensated and indemnified the insured company against loss by reason of any liability imposed upon said insured company under the workmen's compensation laws of Texas for damages on account of injury or death of employees. By the terms of the policies the premiums due and payable by the insured company were based upon the entire remuneration earned during the term of the policies by the employees of the insured company, except officers whose duties did not expose them to any operative hazard of the business. The insured company paid to the insurance company under each of the policies $91.95 as an estimate advance premium. As ascertained by an examination of the books, and based on the amount of compensation paid its employees (except officers) all and entire, there was due and payable by the insured company as premiums, over and above the advanced sum of $91.95, the sum of $234.75 under the first policy of September 3, 1918, and the sum of $776.55 under the next policy of September 3, 1919. Upon failure to pay these several sums of money due as premiums the insurance company brought the suit to recover judgment therefor against the insured company.
The insured company answered the suit and denied liability for the premiums, such as are based upon the employees distinctively engaged in making crates and boxes, upon the ground that it was engaged in the business both of operating a cotton gin and also in the manufacture of crates and boxes, and the policies covered only those employees employed at the gin, and not its employees distinctively engaged in the different work of making crates and boxes.
The case was tried before the court without a jury. The following is a summary of the findings of fact made by the court, viz.:
(1) The Bullard Gin & Mill Company is a corporation under the laws of Texas, and the purpose for which it was formed was "the construction or purchase and maintenance of mills, gins." Section 28, art. 1121, R. S. The company operated a cotton gin during the period of time from September 3, 1918, to the date of trial in December, 1921. The company also operated a box factory, and had a number of employees engaged in the manufacture of boxes and crates intended for use in shipping fruit and vegetables, from September 3, 1918, to date of trial in December, 1921. The box factory was located about 150 yards distant from the building in which the cotton gin and machinery was located, "and was a separate unit therefrom, but under the same management, and it employed hands separate from the cotton gin, and kept the pay rolls separate."
(2) That the provisions of each of the two policies were the same, and under each the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company agreed with the Bullard Mill & Gin Company, a corporation, as follows (omitting parts not bearing upon the issues):
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Allen v. Raftery
... ... (N. C.), 4 S.E.2d 507; U. S. F. & G ... Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co. (Texas), 245 S.W. 720; ... Levine v. East ... 46, 170 N.E. 839; ... Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Hill Const. Co., 164 A ... 16, 11 N ... ...
-
Barron v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.
...not covered by the policy. Nothing in the Workmen's Compensation Act prohibits this construction. U. S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co. (Tex. Civ. App.) 245 S. W. 720; Employers' Indemnity Corporation v. Felter (Tex. Civ. App.) 264 S. W. 137; Interstate Casualty Co. v. Mar......
-
United States Fid. & Guar. Co v. Stubbs
...Atl. 709, 713; Paulson v. Industrial Accident Commission, 44 Cal. App.2d 511, 112 P.2d 710, 712; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co., Tex.Civ.App., 245 S.W. 720, 722; Kretchmer v. Monroe Union Oil Co., 260 N.Y. 276, 183 N.E. 387, 388. The cases of Zurich General ......
-
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Stubbs
...A. 709, 713; Paulson v. Industrial Accident Commission, 44 Cal.App.2d 511, 112 P.2d 710, 712; United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bullard Gin & Mill Co., Tex.Civ.App., 245 S.W. 720, 722; Kretchmer Monroe Union Oil Co., 260 N.Y. 276, 183 N.E. 387, 388. The cases of Zurich General Accide......