United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Loyd
Decision Date | 12 November 1926 |
Docket Number | (No. 3281.)<SMALL><SUP>*</SUP></SMALL> |
Citation | 288 S.W. 662 |
Parties | UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY CO. v. LOYD et al. |
Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Upshur County; J. R. Warren, Judge.
Proceeding under the Workmen's Compensation Act by P. S. Loyd and another for the death of Paul Loyd, opposed by the Gilmer Motor Company, employer, and the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company, insurance carrier. From an award of the Industrial Accident Board the insurance carrier appeals. Affirmed.
See, also, 278 S. W. 282.
Seay, Seay, Malone & Lipscomb, of Dallas, and Briggs & Davis, of Gilmer, for appellant.
C. E. Florence, of Gilmer, for appellees.
This suit was filed in the court below by appellant as an appeal from an award of the Industrial Accident Board. On June 16, 1924, Paul Loyd, an employee of the Gilmer Motor Company, was accidentally killed. His father and mother, appellees in this court, presented a claim to the Industrial Accident Board and were awarded $14.42 per week for 360 weeks. A provision was also made in the award allowing attorney's fees to be paid in weekly installments.
The principal question presented in this appeal is, Do the facts show that Loyd was killed while in the performance of a service for his employer? The jury found that he was, and, upon that finding, an appropriate judgment was rendered.
The following are, in substance, the material facts proved on the trial: Approximately 60 days prior to the accident, the Gilmer Motor Company, who carried a policy with the appellant, had sold a Fordson tractor to one of its customers. It was understood between the buyer and the seller that the former was entitled to free service in the way of repairing defects that might develop during a period of 90 days after the sale. On the day of the accident Paul Loyd and other employees were engaged in unloading a shipment of Ford cars for the Gilmer Motor Company at the Cotton Belt depot in Gilmer. The railway platform used in loading and unloading freight at that place was elevated some distance above the ground and was approached by an inclined driveway. While Loyd and his associates were unloading and putting the new cars together, the tractor, previously referred to as having been sold by the Gilmer Motor Company, was driven to the platform and stopped at the foot of the inclined driveway. The tractor was driven by S. W. Ledbetter, an employee of the purchaser, for the purposes of being shipped to an oil field in Louisiana. After stopping the tractor at the foot of the driveway, the driver called Loyd's attention to some needed adjustment of the machine. It appears that the ignition system of the tractor was not in good working order. The engine was "missing," and there was a consequent loss of motor power. Loyd responded and made some adjustments about the coils and the carburetor, which apparently remedied the defects. He then undertook to drive the tractor up the inclined driveway to the platform. In the attempt, the tractor turned over and crushed his body so that he died in a short time thereafter.
Stracner, a witness for the appellant, testified:
Ledbetter, the driver of the tractor, testified that when he asked Loyd to make the adjustments, the latter did as he was requested and adjusted the carburetor and the coils. He said:
On cross-examination, he was asked if he had not signed the following affidavit on a previous occasion:
...
To continue reading
Request your trial