United States v. Allen, 25171.
| Decision Date | 24 September 1970 |
| Docket Number | No. 25171.,25171. |
| Citation | 431 F.2d 712 |
| Parties | UNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Bobby Ray ALLEN, Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Joseph B. Durra (argued), San Francisco, Cal., for appellant.
Tom G. Kontos (argued), Asst. U. S. Atty., Robert L. Meyer, U. S. Atty., David R. Nissen, Chief Criminal Division, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
Before KOELSCH, ELY, and KILKENNY, Circuit Judges.
In a jury trial, Allen was found guilty of having unlawfully transported a motor vehicle in interstate commerce. 18 U.S.C. § 2312. His challenge to the conviction is based upon his contention that he was deprived of a fair trial because of certain remarks made by the trial judge during the course of the trial and in the presence of the jury. He points to nine pages of the record and characterizes comments which there appear as "ridicule" and "rebukes" directed to counsel.
It is true, of course, that a trial judge must maintain, especially in a jury trial, that restraint which is essential to the dignity of the court and to the assurance of an atmosphere of impartiality. In this case, however, we cannot agree that the district judge overstepped the bounds of propriety. And even if it could be said that the several comments, considered as a whole, constituted error, the error could not have operated so as to prejudice, significantly, the rights of the accused. The evidence of his guilt was overwhelming.
Affirmed.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
United States v. Cook
...the rule should not be applied to the court's remarks. United States v. Workman, supra, 454 F.2d pp. 1124, 1127; United States v. Allen, 431 F.2d 712, 713 (9th Cir. 1970); Duran v. United States, 413 F.2d 596, 600 (9th Cir. 1969); Carroll v. United States, 326 F. 2d 72, 82 (9th Cir. 1963). ......
-
U.S. v. McPartlin
...v. United States, 438 F.2d 858, 862-63 (5th Cir.), Cert. denied, 404 U.S. 828, 92 S.Ct. 63, 30 L.Ed.2d 56 (1971); United States v. Allen, 431 F.2d 712, 712-13 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Wilkins, 422 F.Supp. 1371 (E.D.Pa.1976), Aff'd sub nom. Appeal of Smith, 547 F.2d 1164 (3d Cir. 19......
-
United States v. Sidman
...defense. A reading of the testimony of defendant's witnesses indicates a well ordered presentation of two alibis. Cf., United States v. Allen, 431 F.2d 712 (9th Cir. 1970). Finally, Sidman raises three alleged errors relating to the Court's evidentiary rulings. The first relates to the alib......
-
Miles v. State
...restraint which is essential to the dignity of the court and to the assurance of an atmosphere of impartiality." United States v. Allen , 431 F.2d 712, 713 (9th Cir. 1970) ; see also Holderer v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 114 Nev. 845, 850, 963 P.2d 459, 463 (1998) (finding judicial misconduct ......