United States v. Kitchen, 73-1094.

Decision Date27 June 1973
Docket NumberNo. 73-1094.,73-1094.
Citation480 F.2d 1222
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Albert Ray KITCHEN, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

David P. Murrin, Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

J. Earl Cudd, Asst. U. S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for appellee.

Before GIBSON, LAY and ROSS, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

This cause having been briefed and argued and submitted to this court on its merits on June 12, 1973, is hereby remanded to the trial court for an evidentiary hearing consistent with United States v. Pollard, 8 Cir., 479 F.2d 310, order filed May 18, 1973.

The record demonstrates that the government at a pretrial proceeding assured both the court and defendant that the informant, Sammy Floyd, would be available to testify at trial. The record shows that Floyd did not appear at trial and the trial court excused the government from producing informant on the government's statement that Floyd's whereabouts were unknown at the time of trial. The record demonstrates that Floyd may have possessed material knowledge relating to the defendant's participation in the charge of his distributing cocaine on September 24, 1971.

Therefore in accordance with Pollard, we remand the cause

"`to the trial court for the limited purpose of holding a further hearing at which the government shall be given the opportunity of proving if such be the case, that it was genuinely unable through reasonable efforts to produce Floyd and also, if such be the case, that the government did not take steps to see to it that Floyd would be or become unavailable as a witness. The burden of proving these things should be on the government.\'"

The court upon remand may hear such evidence as it deems necessary and proper, and then shall certify its findings to this court.

To continue reading

Request your trial
10 cases
  • United States v. Barnes
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • November 2, 1973
    ...effort to have the informant made available to the defendant to interview or use as a witness, if desired. See United States v. Kitchen, 480 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Pollard, 479 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Hayes, 477 F.2d 868 (10th Cir. 1973). As stated in......
  • United States v. Webster
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • January 22, 1974
    ...every reasonable effort to have the informant made available to the defendant to interview or to use as a witness. United States v. Kitchen, 480 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Pollard, 479 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1973). Here a proper request for the informant's whereabouts was direc......
  • United States v. Abdulkadir
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Minnesota
    • December 31, 2015
    ...asserts that these discovery requests are made pursuant to Rovario v. United States, 353 U.S. 53, 61 (1957); United States v. Kitchen, 480 F.2d 1222, 1223 (8th Cir. 1973); and Devose v. Norris, 53 F.3d 201, 206-07 (8th Cir. 1995). Defendant also seeks an order making the CIs available for i......
  • Turner v. Wyrick
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • March 8, 1979
    ...on United States v. Webster, 490 F.2d 435 (8th Cir. 1974); United States v. Barnes, 486 F.2d 776 (8th Cir. 1973); United States v. Kitchen, 480 F.2d 1222 (8th Cir. 1973); and United States v. Pollard, 479 F.2d 310 (8th Cir. 1973), Cert. denied, 414 U.S. 1137, 94 S.Ct. 882, 38 L.Ed.2d 762 (1......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT