United States v. Liggins, 71-1137.

Decision Date17 November 1971
Docket NumberNo. 71-1137.,71-1137.
Citation451 F.2d 577
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Appellee, v. Bobbie Gene LIGGINS, Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Alfred I. Harris, St. Louis, Mo., filed brief for appellant.

Daniel Bartlett, Jr., U. S. Atty., and David W. Harlan, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., filed brief for appellee.

Before LAY, HEANEY and STEPHENSON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

A one count information was filed December 18, 1970, against Bobbie Gene Liggins charging him with a violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 1708 in that he, on October 16, 1970, unlawfully possessed a Missouri Treasury check knowing that it had been stolen from the United States mails.

Counsel was appointed for Liggins. He entered a plea of not guilty. After a one day trial he was convicted by a jury. Judge Webster imposed a two year sentence. The only issue raised on appeal concerns the sufficiency of the evidence as to whether the defendant possessed the check with knowledge that it was stolen. In making this determination, we take that view of the evidence which is most favorable to the Government as the prevailing party and accord the Government the benefit of inferences reasonably to be drawn from the facts proved.1

The check in question was one for $105.00, dated October 10, 1970, and issued from Jefferson City, Missouri, to Roxie Mae Elbert, as a welfare payment. Miss Elbert testified that she did not receive the expected check in the mail. She had given no authority to anyone to receive the check. She was not acquainted with Bobbie Gene Liggins at the time of the events in question.

There is testimony from the arresting officers that they observed the defendant in the company of another standing on a street corner at 11:00 p. m. the evening of October 16; that they approached the pair and observed the defendant reaching into his right rear pocket and dropping two envelopes to the ground; that they examined the envelopes and found one to contain the check in question, and that the envelope containing the check was postmarked October 15, 1970,2 and bore a return address in the name of the State Division of Welfare.

Liggins was the only witness to testify on his behalf. He stated that he found the treasury check enclosed in a hardbound blue book on the street the morning of October 16; that he decided immediately to return it to the payee, Miss Elbert, with the hope of obtaining a small reward; that he attempted so to do by walking to her home three times but never could find anyone at home; that later the same day he encountered one Clayborne Fudge; that he displayed the check to Fudge and told him of his desire to return it to its rightful owner; that he entrusted the check to Fudge...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • United States v. Bass
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • January 11, 1973
    ...the prevailing party and accord the Government in this case the inferences reasonably to be drawn from the facts shown. United States v. Liggins, 451 F.2d 577 (CA8 1971). The record adequately supports the conviction on Count Evidentiary Rulings We find no error in the trial court's admissi......
  • United States v. Baty
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit
    • November 19, 1973
    ...property, were circumstances from which the jury could reasonably conclude that he knew the checks had been stolen. United States v. Liggins, 451 F.2d 577 (8th Cir. 1971). Consequently, there was more than sufficient evidence to support Baty's conviction on Count I. United States v. Roberts......
  • U.S. v. Wilson
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • October 14, 1975
    ...407 F.2d 604, 606-07 (8th Cir. 1969), Quoting from Aron v. United States, 382 F.2d 965, 971 (8th Cir. 1967). See also United States v. Liggins, 451 F.2d 577 (8th Cir. 1971); Wangrow v. United States, 399 F.2d 106, 118 (8th Cir.), Cert. denied, 393 U.S. 933, 89 S.Ct. 292, 21 L.Ed.2d 270 (196......
  • United States v. Parks
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • February 16, 1972
    ...in support of the jury verdict, we must take the view most favorable to the Government in support thereof. United States v. Liggins, 451 F.2d 577, 578 n. 1 (CA8 1971). We are satisfied that the evidence amply supports the verdict of guilty. A brief review of the evidence will be sufficient.......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT