United States v. Lucero, 26248

Decision Date18 May 1971
Docket Number26249.,No. 26248,26248
PartiesUNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Armando LUCERO, Defendant-Appellant.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit

Phillip Andreen, San Diego, Cal., for appellant.

Harry D. Steward, U. S. Atty., Robert H. Filsinger, Chief, Criminal Division, Brian E. Michaels, Asst. U. S. Atty., San Diego, Cal., for appellee.

Before BROWNING, CARTER and TRASK, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

The appellant was convicted and sentenced under two indictments charging him with the smuggling and transportation of aliens (18 U.S.C. § 1324). The sentences were made to run concurrently.

Appellant now contends that the judgment of the trial court must be reversed because of error in allowing the introduction of hearsay evidence. There was no objection made at the trial to its reception. He also contends that he was denied the adequate assistance of counsel. For the following reasons, the judgment must be affirmed.

(1) The hearsay related only to charges under one of the two indictments. The concurrent sentences rule makes examination of this assignment of error unnecessary. Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784, 89 S.Ct. 2056, 23 L. Ed.2d 707 (1969); Hirabayashi v. United States, 320 U.S. 81, 105, 63 S.Ct. 1375, 87 L.Ed. 1774 (1943); United States v. Jack, 439 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. 1971). There is no merit to the contention that the introduction of this evidence "contaminated" the entire trial. United States v. Jack, supra.

(2) The record does not disclose the gross inadequacy of counsel which is required before this court will consider this contention on direct review. United States v. Johnson, 434 F.2d 827, 830 (9th Cir. 1970); United States v. Porter, 431 F.2d 7 (9th Cir. 1970).

To continue reading

Request your trial
4 cases
  • United States v. Tyler
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 4 Diciembre 1972
    ...United States v. LaMont, 447 F.2d 1311 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Fishbein, 446 F.2d 1201 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Lucero, 443 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Washabaugh, 442 F.2d 1127 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Crouch, 442 F. 2d 427 (9th Cir. 1971); United ......
  • U.S. v. Kazni
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 5 Junio 1978
    ...F.2d at 652; United States v. Johnson, 434 F.2d at 830-31; see United States v. Parr-Pla, 549 F.2d at 663; United States v. Lucero, 443 F.2d 64, 65 (9th Cir. 1971) (per curiam). The trial record on this direct appeal provides no basis for ruling upon appellant's conclusionary allegations, a......
  • United States v. Asteguieta-Luna, 26287.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 27 Agosto 1971
    ...delay. The remaining issue need not be considered, appellant having received concurrent sentences on all counts. United States v. Lucero, 443 F.2d 64 (9th Cir. 1971); United States v. Jack, 439 F.2d 879 (9th Cir. The decision of the district court is affirmed and the mandate will issue fort......
  • United States v. Cepelis, 71-1037.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 18 Mayo 1971

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT