United States v. Slenker
Decision Date | 31 October 1887 |
Citation | 32 F. 691 |
Parties | UNITED STATES v. SLENKER. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
At the July special term, 1887, the defendant, Elmina D. Slinker was indicted under Rev. St. U.S. Sec. 3893, (2d Ed. 1878) in the district court of the United States for the Western district of Virginia. The indictment contained two counts which were in these words (omitting formal parts,) viz.:
First Count. That the defendant, on the fifteenth day of March 1887, at, etc., etc.
Second Count. Said defendant, on the fifth day of October, 1886, at, etc., etc.
The case having been adjourned to the October term, the defendant, on October 31, 1887, was put upon trial upon this indictment.
The court (PAUL, J.) charged the jury as follows:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Babbitt v. State
... ... Court of Appeals, 395-401.) The scienter ... must be alleged and proven. (U. S. v. Slenker, 32 F ... 691-695; U. S. v. Carrl, 105 U. S. Rep. 611-612.) It ... is only when the statute sets ... Stats. 1910; it follows the language of the statute. The ... statute states all of the essential elements of the offense ... An information in the language of the statute is ... ...
-
Bonica v. Olesen
...were open to such influences, United States v. Clarke, 8 Cir., 38 F. 732; having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts, United States v. Slenker, 4 Cir., 32 F. 691; that form of indecency which is calculated to promote the general corruption of morals, United States v. Males, 7 Cir., 51 F. ......
-
In re Wellcome
... ... members of the 6th legislative assembly in the election of a ... United States senator. Some of the charges are upon ... knowledge, and others upon information and ... Stickney, 53 Kan. 308, 36 P. 714; ... People v. Noelke, 94 Ind. 507; U.S. v. Slenker ... (D. C.) 32 F. 691; State v. Jansen, 22 Kan ... 498; U.S. v. Moore (D. C.) 19 F. 39; 3 ... ...
-
Sunshine Book Company v. Summerfield
...or desires. Passing on to the second word which appears in the statute, namely, the word "lewd", it has been defined in United States v. Slenker, D.C., 32 F. 691, as having a tendency to excite lustful thoughts. In the case of United States v. Males, decided in D.C., 51 F. 41, the word "lew......