United States v. Univis Lens Co.

Citation37 F. Supp. 459
PartiesUNITED STATES v. UNIVIS LENS CO., Inc., et al.
Decision Date03 February 1941
CourtU.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

Samuel S. Isseks, Sp. Asst. to the Atty. Gen., Stanley E. Disney and Marcus A. Hollabaugh, both of Washington, D. C., Special Attorneys, for plaintiff.

Frederick S. Duncan, of New York City, and Toulmin & Toulmin, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

COXE, District Judge.

It is clear from the affidavits submitted on this motion that the corporate defendants are "transacting business" in the Southern District; that is all that is required to sustain the venue here under Section 12 of the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C.A. 22. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Co., 273 U.S. 359, 47 S.Ct. 400, 71 L.Ed. 684; Hansen Packing Company v. Armour & Co., D.C., 16 F.Supp. 784; Sure-Fit Products Co. v. Fry Products Inc., D.C., 23 F.Supp. 610

The motion of the defendants to quash the service is denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
1 cases
  • Rohlfing v. Cat's Paw Rubber Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Illinois
    • June 18, 1951
    ... ... CAT'S PAW RUBBER CO., Inc. et al ... SHAFFER et al ... UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. et al ... Nos. 50 C 229, 50 C 844 ... United ... 123; United States v. Universal Lens, D.C.N.Y., 37 F.Supp. 459 ...         The venue of an action of ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT