Unterlack v. Westport Ins. Co.

Decision Date11 May 2005
Docket NumberNo. 4D04-1974.,4D04-1974.
Citation901 So.2d 387
PartiesDavid B. UNTERLACK and Marketing Enterprises, Inc., Appellants, v. WESTPORT INSURANCE COMPANY, Martha Jacobson, and M.J. Seide, Appellees.
CourtFlorida District Court of Appeals

Daniel Martinez of Lidsky, Vaccaro & Montes, Attorneys At Law, P.A., Hialeah, for appellants.

Jeffrey M. Landau and Jonathan M. Fordin of Shutts & Bowen LLP, Miami, for appellee Westport Insurance Company.

ON MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION AND/OR REHEARING

GROSS, J.

We grant the motion for rehearing and withdraw our previously issued per curiam affirmance.

Appellant, David B. Unterlack, was an insurance agent and broker in the business of selling various insurance products through his agency, Marketing Enterprises, Inc. Unterlack had a professional liability policy issued by appellee, Westport Insurance Corporation.

Unterlack sold health insurance policies that were issued by the Vanguard Asset Group. Vanguard was not a licensed insurer in Florida and failed to pay claims made under the policies. Two purchasers of Vanguard policies from Unterlack filed lawsuits alleging that Unterlack had breached his duty to them in obtaining these policies.

Unterlack tendered each of these lawsuits to Westport and demanded that it defend and indemnify in these proceedings. Westport agreed to defend, but reserved its right to deny coverage.

Westport filed suit against Unterlack, seeking a declaratory judgment that the claims were not covered under the terms of the liability insurance policy. Before any ruling on the merits, Westport filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. There was no language qualifying or limiting the dismissal. After the voluntary dismissal, Westport settled the underlying lawsuits against Unterlack.

Unterlack filed a motion for attorney's fees and costs, based on Westport's voluntary dismissal and the settlement of the individual claims. After a hearing, the trial court denied the motion for attorney's fees and costs.

Unterlack seeks recovery of attorney's fees under Section 627.428(1), Florida Statutes (2004), which provides:

Upon the rendition of a judgment or decree by any of the courts of this state against an insurer and in favor of any named or omnibus insured or the named beneficiary under a policy or contract executed by the insurer, the trial court or, in the event of an appeal in which the insured or beneficiary prevails, the appellate court shall adjudge or decree against the insurer and in favor of the insured or beneficiary a reasonable sum as fees or compensation for the insured's or beneficiary's attorney prosecuting the suit in which the recovery is had.

Actual rendition of an order or decree is not an absolute prerequisite to an insured's entitlement to attorney's fees under the statute. See Wollard v. Lloyd's & Cos. of Lloyd's, 439 So.2d 217, 218 (Fla.1983). Thus in Wollard, the supreme court held that the "settlement of a disputed case is the functional equivalent of a confession of judgment or verdict in favor of the insured, and thus, provides a basis for an award of attorney fees. . . ." United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Murray, 671 So.2d 812, 813 (Fla. 4th DCA 1996).

This case is controlled by O'Malley v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 890 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). There, O'Malley was the defendant in a tort action. Nationwide defended her, but reserved its right to deny coverage, filing a separate declaratory relief action concerning coverage and the duty to defend. While the declaratory action was pending, Nationwide took advantage of a favorable result under an offer of judgment to resolve the tort claim by a stipulation for dismissal with prejudice, with each party bearing its own costs and fees. Nationwide then voluntarily dismissed the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
9 cases
  • Mercury Ins. Co. of Florida v. Cooper
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 23, 2005
    ...and voluntarily dismisses a related declaratory judgment action without qualifying or limiting the dismissal. Unterlack v. Westport Ins. Co., 901 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005); O'Malley v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 890 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 4th DCA 2004). In Unterlack, the Fourth District s......
  • Goff v. State Farm Florida Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • December 12, 2008
    ...decree is not an absolute prerequisite to an insured's entitlement to attorney's fees under the statute." See Unterlack v. Westport Ins. Co., 901 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (citing Wollard v. Lloyd's & Cos. of Lloyd's, 439 So.2d 217, 218 (Fla.1983)); see § Section 627.428 "discourag......
  • Zurich Am. Ins. Co. v. Sunshine Freight Carriers, Inc.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Middle District of Florida
    • January 20, 2016
    ...suits. See Mercury Insurance Co. of Florida v. Cooper, 919 So.2d 491 (Fla. 3d Dist.Ct.App.2005); Unterlack v. Westport Insurance Co, 901 So.2d 387 (Fla. 4th Dist.Ct.App.2005); O'Malley v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co, 890 So.2d 1163 (Fla. 4th Dist.Ct.App.2004), Canal Insurance is dir......
  • Explorer Ins. Co. v. Cajusma
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 6, 2015
    ...award attorney fees upon rendition of a judgment or decree against an insurer and in favor of an insured); Unterlack v. Westport Insurance Co., 901 So.2d 387, 389 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (holding the liability insurer's voluntary dismissal of a declaratory judgment action against insured before......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT