Upton v. Hutchison

Decision Date05 May 1950
Citation46 So.2d 20
PartiesUPTON v. HUTCHISON.
CourtFlorida Supreme Court

J. M. & H. P. Sapp, Panama City, for appellant.

Thomas Sale, Panama City, for appellee.

ROBERTS, Justice.

The judgment here appealed from was entered by the court below in a civil action for assault and battery brought by plaintiff-appellee against defendant-appellant, wherein the jury found for the plaintiff and awarded damages in the amount of $2,500.00.

It is well settled that the verdict of a jury will not be disturbed by this court on appeal where there is ample substantial evidence to support such verdict. Nor will this court substitute its judgment for that of the jury as to the amount of damages to which the plaintiff is entitled, unless the amount found is so excessive as to indicate that the jury was influenced by passion, prejudice, corruption, or other improper motive. Loftin v. Dagley, 152 Fla. 831, 13 So.2d 311; Florida Motor Lines Corp. v. Shontz, 159 Fla. 518, 32 So.2d 248.

No error having been made to appear, the judgment of the lower court should be and it is hereby.

Affirmed.

ADAMS, C. J., and TERRELL and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

To continue reading

Request your trial
14 cases
  • Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Braz
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • January 25, 1966
    ...'so excessive as to indicate that the jury was influenced by passion, prejudice, corruption, or other improper motive,' Upton v. Hutchinson, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 20, 21, or 'so much greater than it should have been as to shock the judicial conscience,' Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 48......
  • Bould v. Touchette
    • United States
    • Florida Supreme Court
    • July 28, 1977
    ...jury. Higbee v. Dorigo, Fla.1953, 66 So.2d 684; Merwin v. Kellems, Fla.1955, 78 So.2d 865; Sproule v. Nelson, supra. "In Upton v. Hutchison, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 20, 21, the Supreme Court said: 'It is well settled that the verdict of a jury will not be disturbed by this court on appeal where ......
  • Direct Transport Co. of Fla. v. Rakaskas
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • September 9, 1964
    ...illegal motives, or that it was so excessive as to shock judicial conscience to justify the granting of a new trial. See: Upton v. Hutchison, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 20; Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480; Florida East Coast Railway Company v. Stewart, supra. When damages are allowable fo......
  • Coast Cities Coaches, Inc. v. Donat
    • United States
    • Florida District Court of Appeals
    • November 18, 1958
    ...'so excessive as to indicate that the jury was influenced by passion, prejudice, corruption, or other improper motive,' Upton v. Hutchison, Fla.1950, 46 So.2d 20, 21, or 'so much greater than it should have been as to shock the judicial conscience,' Bartholf v. Baker, Fla.1954, 71 So.2d 480......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT