US Nat'l Bank Ass'n v. Melton
| Decision Date | 13 December 2011 |
| Parties | US NATIONAL BANK ASSOCIATION as Trustee, respondent, v. Glen Harlan MELTON, appellant. |
| Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Walter T. Ramsey, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Rosicki, Rosicki & Associates, P.C., Plainview, N.Y. (Owen M. Robinson of counsel), for respondent.
In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered August 9, 2010, which denied his motion, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale of the same court entered April 15, 2008, upon his default in answering the complaint or otherwise appearing in the action.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.
This action was commenced in early May 2006. According to the affidavit of service, the defendant was served with copies of the summons and complaint at his home on May 8, 2006, by delivery of a copy of the summons and complaint to Angelica Guevara, referred to as a cotenant, and by the mailing of a second copy of the summons and complaint to his home, all pursuant to CPLR 308(2). The defendant neither answered the complaint nor otherwise appeared in the action. On April 15, 2008, a judgment of foreclosure and sale (hereinafter the judgment) was entered against him. On November 17, 2008, a copy of the judgment was served upon the defendant with notice of entry. On May 5, 2009, a foreclosure auction was held, and the mortgaged property was sold. In May 2010 the defendant moved, inter alia, pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate the judgment entered upon his default. In support, he submitted an affidavit stating, in conclusory fashion, that he was never personally served with a copy of the summons and complaint, and that he did not have “a precise recollection” as to whether he received a copy of the summons and complaint in time to defend against the action. The defendant's attorney, in an affirmation made without any personal knowledge of the facts, asserted that Guevara did not speak or understand English, and that a hearing was necessary on the issue of whether she gave a copy of the summons and complaint to the defendant with enough time to answer. The Supreme Court denied the defendant's motion concluding, inter alia, that his affidavit was conclusory and failed to rebut the process server's affidavit. We affirm.
The Supreme Court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was pursuant to CPLR 5015(a)(4) to vacate the judgment. The affidavit of the process server constituted prima facie evidence of proper service pursuant to CPLR 308(2) ( see Deutsche Bank Natl. Trust Co. v. Hussain, 78 A.D.3d 989, 912 N.Y.S.2d 595), and the defendant's unsubstantiated denial of receipt was insufficient to rebut the presumption of proper service ( id.). A hearing is not required where, as here, the defendant fails to swear to specific facts rebutting the statements in the process server's affidavit ( see U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Arias, 85 A.D.3d 1014, 1015, 927 N.Y.S.2d 362; Scarano v. Scarano, 63 A.D.3d 716, 880 N.Y.S.2d 682). Furthermore, the affirmation of an attorney which is not based upon personal knowledge of the facts is of no probative or evidentiary significance ( see JMD Holding Corp....
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Wells Fargo Bank N.A. v. Arthur
...; Barcov Holding Corp. v. Bexin Realty Corp., 16 AD3d 282, 792 N.Y.S.2d 408 [1st Dept 2005] ; see also, U.S. Natl. Bank Assn. v. Melton, 90 AD3d 742, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 [2d Dept 2011] ).Thus, even when considered in the light favorable to Mrs. Arthur, her opposing papers and moving papers are......
-
BAC Home Loan Servicing, LP v. Bertram
...884 [2d Dept.2013] ; Bank of N.Y. v. Espejo, 92 A.D.3d 707, 708, 939 N.Y.S.2d 105 [2d Dept.2012] ; US Natl. Bank Assn. v. Melton, 90 A.D.3d 742, 743, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 [2d Dept.2011] ), including the observance of the due diligent requirement imposed by CPLR 308(4) (see Wells Fargo v. Beseme......
-
CitiMortgage, Inc. v. Pembelton
...820, 954 N.Y.S.2d 577 [2d Dept. 2012];Bank of N.Y. v. Espejo, 92 A.D.3d 707, 939 N.Y.S.2d 105, supra;US Natl. Bank Assoc. v. Melton, 90 A.D.3d 742, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 [2d Dept. 2011];Countrywide Home Loans Serv., LP v. Albert, 78 A.D.3d 983, 912 N.Y.S.2d 96 [2d Dept. 2010];Mortgage Elec. Sys.......
-
Qureshi v. Vital Transp., Inc., 2016–11035
...some of the submitted materials (see Onewest Bank, FSB v. Michel , 143 A.D.3d 869, 871, 39 N.Y.S.3d 485 ; U.S. Nat. Bank Assn. v. Melton , 90 A.D.3d 742, 743, 934 N.Y.S.2d 352 ). While additional materials were submitted together with a client affidavit on reply, that evidence was improperl......