US v. Giampa
Decision Date | 17 August 1995 |
Docket Number | Crim. A. No. 94-403 (AJL). |
Citation | 904 F. Supp. 235 |
Parties | UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. Joseph GIAMPA, Gennaro Vittorio, a/k/a "Gerry Giampa," Joseph Gaito, James McManus, Benjamin Segarra, Elliot Porco and John Capra, a/k/a "Johnny Hooks," Defendants. |
Court | U.S. District Court — District of New Jersey |
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED
Faith S. Hochberg, United States Attorney, Jose P. Sierra, Kevin E. McCarthy, Mariellen Dugan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Office of United States Attorney, Newark, New Jersey, for U.S.
Thomas R. Ashley, Raymond L. Hamlin, Ashley & Charles, Newark, New Jersey, for Joseph Giampa.
Robert J. Fettweis, Fleming, Roth & Fettweis, Newark, New Jersey, for Gennaro Vittorio.
James C. Patton, Livingston, New Jersey, for Joseph Gaito.
Cathy L. Waldor, Waldor, Carlesimo & Biancone, Montclair, New Jersey, for James McManus.
James J. Culleton, Culleton, Marinaccio & Foglia, Englewood, New Jersey, for Benjamin Segarra.
George L. Santangelo, Richard A. Medina, Santangelo, Santangelo & Cohen, New York City, for John Capra.
Bruce Cutler, New York City, for Elliot Porco.
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
U.S v. Alsugair
...Under the exacting standard by which they are evaluated, motions to strike surplusage are rarely granted. See United States v. Giampa, 904 F.Supp. 235, 271 (D.N.J.1995). "A motion to strike surplusage from an indictment is addressed to the sound discretion of the District Court and should b......
-
U.S. v. Bissell
...evidence even when the defendant had not requested the information. Id. at 107, 96 S.Ct. at 2399; see United States v. Giampa, 904 F.Supp. 235, 280 n. 33 (D.N.J.1995). In Giglio, the Supreme Court held the Brady rule includes information that could be used to impeach the credibility of Gove......
-
U.S. v. Mariani
...to provide the defendant with the results of the government's investigation); Caruso, 948 F.Supp. at 393 (same); United States v. Giampa, 904 F.Supp. 235, 280 (D.N.J.1995) ("Although Rule 7(f) is construed liberally, it does not permit defendant to receive wholesale discovery of the Governm......
-
U.S. v. Wall
...340 (E.D.Wis.1995) (upholding 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1)); United States v. Hart, 895 F.Supp. 189 (N.D.Ohio 1995) (same); United States v. Giampa, 904 F.Supp. 235 (D.N.J.1995) (upholding 18 U.S.C. §§ 922(a)(4), 922(d)(1) & (2), 922(k), 26 U.S.C. § 5861(e)); United States v. Williams, 893 F.Supp.......
-
Discovery
...1987) (citing United States v. Somers , 496 F.2d 723, 729 (3d Cir.), cert. denied , 419 U.S. 832, (1974)).” United States v. Giampa , 904 F.Supp. 235, 264 (D.N.J. 1995). MOTION TO SEVER THE TRIAL OF LD FROM THAT OF GD UNDER RULE 14 16. The defendants will present mutually antagonistic and e......
-
Motion practice
...and defendants are properly joined. Misjoinder is legal error and thus more likely to earn relief. [ See United States v. Giampa , 904 F.Supp. 235, 264 (D.N.J. 1995).] Prosecutors and trial courts have substantial discretion in joining counts and defendants for trial, and judicial economy f......
-
Criminal Antitrust Enforcement
...related to bills of particulars). 476. See, e.g., United States v. Ivy, 83 F.3d 1266, 1281 (10th Cir. 1996); United States v. Giampa, 904 F. Supp. 235, 279 (D.N.J. 1995), aff’d mem. , 107 F.3d 9 (3d Cir. 1997); United States v. Brock, 863 F. Supp. 851, 867 (E.D. Wis. 1994), aff’d sub nom. U......