US v. Village of Airmont

• Decision Date: 25 April 1996
• Docket Number: No. 91 Civ. 8453 (GLG).,91 Civ. 8453 (GLG).
• Citation: 925 F. Supp. 160
• Parties: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The VILLAGE OF AIRMONT, Airmont Civic Association, Ralph Bracco in his capacity as Mayor of the Village of Airmont, John C. Layne, Raymond Kane, Charles Calotta and Ronald Sabo, in their capacities as Trustees of the Village of Airmont, Defendants.
• Court: U.S. District Court — Southern District of New York

925 F. Supp. 160

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. The VILLAGE OF AIRMONT, Airmont Civic Association, Ralph Bracco in his capacity as Mayor of the Village of Airmont, John C. Layne, Raymond Kane, Charles Calotta and Ronald Sabo, in their capacities as Trustees of the Village of Airmont, Defendants.

No. 91 Civ. 8453 (GLG).

United States District Court, S.D. New York.

April 25, 1996.

Craig L. Parshall, Law Offices of Craig Parshall, Fredericksburg, Virginia, for Plaintiffs Rabbi Yitzchok LeBlanc-Sternberg, Chanie LeBlanc-Sternberg, Fred Walfish, Lewis Kamman and Park Avenue Synagogue, Inc.

Sara L. Shudofsky, Assistant United States Attorney, Southern District of New

York, New York City for Plaintiff United States of America.

Dennis E.A. Lynch, Dorfman, Lynch & Knoebel, Nyack, New York, and Brian S. Sokoloff, Thurm & Heller, New York City, for Defendants Village of Airmont, Raymond Kane, Maureen Kendrick and John C. Layne.

Edmund C. Grainger, III, McCullough, Goldberger & Staudt, White Plains, New York, for Defendants Robert Fletcher and Nick Vertullo.

Prior Report: 922 F.Supp. 959

ORDER AND JUDGMENT

GOETTEL, District Judge.

This action having been remanded by the Court of Appeals for the entry of declaratory and injunctive relief as against the Village of Airmont (the Airmont Civic Association having defaulted at the outset of the action), it is ORDERED that:

(1) The defendant Village of Airmont has violated the Fair Housing Act by enacting its Zoning Code.

(2) The Court enjoins the defendant Village of Airmont and its officers, employees, agents, successors, and assigns, as appropriate, and all those acting in concert or participation with them, from:

(a) engaging in any conduct having the purpose or effect of perpetuating or promoting religious discrimination or of denying or abridging the right of any person to equal opportunity on account of religion, including, but not limited to, interpreting the Home Professional Office provision of the Airmont Zoning Code, or any other provision of the Airmont Zoning Code, so as to hinder, prevent, or prohibit persons from assembling in residential dwellings for the purposes of group prayer;

(b) discriminating against any person or group or persons on account of religion in connection with the planning, development, construction, acquisition, financing, operation or approval of any housing in the Village of Airmont;

(c) interfering with any person in the exercise of his right to secure equal housing opportunity for himself or for others; and

(d) taking any action which in any way denies or makes unavailable housing to persons on the basis of religion.

(3) The Village and its officials shall make the following revisions, modifications, deletions, and additions to the Village of Airmont Zoning Code, and take other affirmative steps as set forth below:

(a) The following paragraph will be added to Article I, Section 3 ("Purposes") of the Airmont Zoning Code:

G. Nothing in this Zoning Code of the Village of Airmont, New York shall be construed or interpreted in any manner whatsoever so as to hinder, prevent, or prohibit individuals from peacefully assembling in residential dwellings solely for the purposes of individual or group prayer.

(b) The following paragraph will be added to Section 2 of Article XVIII ("Definitions"):

RESIDENTIAL PLACE OF WORSHIP — An area located within a residence that is used for the conducting of religious services. It is the intent of this Local Law that the presence of pedestrians walking

...