USA. v. Zepeda, PACHECO-ZEPED
| Decision Date | 13 September 2000 |
| Docket Number | No. 99-50720,D,PACHECO-ZEPED,99-50720 |
| Citation | 234 F.3d 411 |
| Parties | (9th Cir. 2000) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. GABRIELefendant-Appellant |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
To continue reading
Request your trial
96 cases
-
State v. Mckague
...overrule Almendarez–Torres “and [instead has] unmistakably carved out an exception for ‘prior convictions.’ ” United States v. Pacheco–Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir.2000) (quoting Apprendi, 530 U.S. at 488–92, 120 S.Ct. 2348), cert. denied, 532 U.S. 966, 121 S.Ct. 1503, 149 L.Ed.2d 388......
-
McKettrick v. Yates
...was constitutionally required to state in the indictment and prove to the jury beyond a reasonable doubt); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 413-15 (9th Cir.2000) (rejecting the defendant's argument that Apprendi limited Almendarez-Torres to cases where a defendant admits the p......
-
State v. Aleman
...out of the hands of the courts"); United States v. Cooper, 375 F.3d 1041, 1053 n. 3 (10th Cir.2004); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 415 (9th Cir.2000) ("Apprendi held that all prior convictions — not just those admitted on the record — were exempt from Apprendi's general rul......
-
State v. Ring
...1917, 1921-22, 104 L.Ed.2d 526 (1989)); accord United States v. Gatewood, 230 F.3d 186, 192 (6th Cir.2000); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir.2000) ("If the views of the Supreme Court's individual justices and the composition of the Court remain the same, Almendare......
Request a trial to view additional results
2 books & journal articles
-
Overruled by Implication
...v. Morris, 293 F.3d 1010 (7th Cir. 2002); United States v. Kempis-Bonola, 287 F.3d 699 (8th Cir. 2002); United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411 (9th Cir. 2001); United States v. Cooper, 375 F.3d 1041 (10th Cir. 2004); and United States v. Marseille, 377 F.3d 1249 (11th Cir. 2004). 98.......
-
The Continuing Vitality of Ravin v. State: Alaskans Still Have a Constitutional Right to Possess Marijuana in the Privacy of Their Homes
...CR, at *1 (Mar. 29, 2006). [198]Id. [199]Id. [200]Id. at *3. [201]Id. [202]Id. at *2. [203]Id. [204]See United States v. Pacheco-Zepeda, 234 F.3d 411, 414 (9th Cir. 2000) ("[S]peculation does not permit us to ignore controlling Supreme Court authority."); see also Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.......