Uyeda v. Brooks, No. 16498.
| Court | United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit) |
| Writing for the Court | WEICK, , PHILLIPS, Circuit , and CECIL, Senior Circuit |
| Citation | 365 F.2d 326 |
| Parties | Yoshio UYEDA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jerome H. BROOKS, Acting Regional Director, Seventh Region, National Labor Relations Board, Defendant-Appellant. |
| Docket Number | No. 16498. |
| Decision Date | 17 August 1966 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
23 practice notes
-
Montalvo v. Madera Unified Sch. Dist. Bd. of Education
...does not render the matter moot (Uyeda v. Brooks (1965) 348 F.2d 633 at 635 (6th Cir.) (Reversed on other grounds, Uyeda v. Brooks (1966) 365 F.2d 326 (6th Cir))). This position was not mentioned in the trial court, nor is it included in the stipulation as to the issues to be resolved by th......
-
Kindred Nursing Ctrs. E., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Nos. 12–1027
...on finality in determining the unit appropriate for bargaining under Section 9(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 159(b).” Uyeda v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326, 330 (6th Cir.1966) (citations omitted). Furthermore, we must uphold the Board's interpretation of the Act if it is “reasonably defensible[;]” we ma......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Cardox Div. of Chemetron Corp., No. 82-3188
...accord International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB, 418 F.2d 1191, 1199 (D.C.Cir.1967); Uyedo v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326, 330-31 (6th Cir.1966); Tidewater Oil Company v. NLRB, 358 F.2d 363, 366 (2nd 15 In Leedom v. Kyne the Supreme Court held that the Board acted outsi......
-
Modern Plastics Corporation v. McCulloch, No. 18576.
...Lines v. Fusco, 323 F.2d 477 (6th Cir. 1963); American Metal Products Company v. Reynolds, 332 F.2d 434 (6th Cir. 1964); Uyeda v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1966); but Leedom v. Kyne indicates that the District Court at least had jurisdiction to determine if the contested Board action w......
Request a trial to view additional results
23 cases
-
Montalvo v. Madera Unified Sch. Dist. Bd. of Education
...does not render the matter moot (Uyeda v. Brooks (1965) 348 F.2d 633 at 635 (6th Cir.) (Reversed on other grounds, Uyeda v. Brooks (1966) 365 F.2d 326 (6th Cir))). This position was not mentioned in the trial court, nor is it included in the stipulation as to the issues to be resolved by th......
-
Kindred Nursing Ctrs. E., LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd., Nos. 12–1027
...on finality in determining the unit appropriate for bargaining under Section 9(b) of the Act, 29 U.S.C. 159(b).” Uyeda v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326, 330 (6th Cir.1966) (citations omitted). Furthermore, we must uphold the Board's interpretation of the Act if it is “reasonably defensible[;]” we ma......
-
N.L.R.B. v. Cardox Div. of Chemetron Corp., 82-3188
...accord International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers v. NLRB, 418 F.2d 1191, 1199 (D.C.Cir.1967); Uyedo v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326, 330-31 (6th Cir.1966); Tidewater Oil Company v. NLRB, 358 F.2d 363, 366 (2nd 15 In Leedom v. Kyne the Supreme Court held that the Board acted outsi......
-
Modern Plastics Corporation v. McCulloch, No. 18576.
...Lines v. Fusco, 323 F.2d 477 (6th Cir. 1963); American Metal Products Company v. Reynolds, 332 F.2d 434 (6th Cir. 1964); Uyeda v. Brooks, 365 F.2d 326 (6th Cir. 1966); but Leedom v. Kyne indicates that the District Court at least had jurisdiction to determine if the contested Board action w......
Request a trial to view additional results