Haber v. Cross County Hospital

Decision Date28 October 1975
Citation378 N.Y.S.2d 369,37 N.Y.2d 888
Parties, 340 N.E.2d 734 Sol HABER et al., Appellants, v. CROSS COUNTY HOSPITAL, Respondent.
CourtNew York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals

Daniel J. Friedman, New York City, for appellants.

William Glatzer, New York City, for respondent.

MEMORANDUM.

The general rule that a hospital is not liable in negligence for the failure to erect bed rails, absent professional medical direction (Grace v. Manhattan Eye, Ear & Throat Hosp., 301 N.Y. 660, 93 N.E.2d 926; Mossman v. Albany Med. Center Hosp., 34 A.D.2d 263, 311 N.Y.S.2d 131), does not apply where the hospital establishes a rule that bed rails were to be set up in all cases where the patient is over 50 years of age. This common-sense precaution adopted by the hospital in recognition of the frailties of older patients did not require medical direction. Only administrative action was needed to implement the rule.

Administrative work is part of the service that a hospital provides and for which the hospital is responsible. (See Sutherland v. New York Polyclinic Med. School & Hosp., 273 App.Div. 29, 30--31, 75 N.Y.S.2d 135, affd. 298 N.Y. 682, 82 N.E.2d 583, mot. for rearg, den. 298 N.Y. 794, 83 N.E.2d 477.) Moreover, the hospital's failure to abide by its own rule is some evidence of negligence. (Danbois v. New York Cent. R.R. Co., 12 N.Y.2d 234, 239, 238 N.Y.S.2d 921, 189 N.E.2d 468.)

Since there was a basis for the imposition of liability upon the hospital, the order of the Appellate Division, 45 A.D.2d 874, 358 N.Y.S.2d 8, should be reversed and the case remitted to that court for a review of the facts. (CPLR 5613.)

BREITEL, C.J., and JASEN, GABRIELLI, JONES, WACHTLER, FUCHSBERG and COOKE, JJ., concur.

Order reversed and case remitted to the Appellate Division, Second Department, for further proceedings in accordance with the memorandum herein, with costs to abide the event.

To continue reading

Request your trial
27 cases
  • Hippocrates Mertsaris v. 73rd Corp.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • December 17, 1984
    ...a violation of the hospital rule, such a violation would only constitute some evidence of negligence (see Haber v. Cross County Hosp., 37 N.Y.2d 888, 378 N.Y.S.2d 369, 340 N.E.2d 734). There was no medical testimony offered to demonstrate that any alleged negligence on Dr. Astin's part in f......
  • McGowan v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 7, 2016
    ...(holding that security company's failure to follow procedures was evidence of negligence); Haber v. Cross County Hosp. , 37 N.Y.2d 888, 889, 378 N.Y.S.2d 369, 340 N.E.2d 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975) (“[T]he hospital's failure to abide by its own rule is some evidence of negligence.”); see also ......
  • Sniatecki v. Violet Realty, Inc.
    • United States
    • New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division
    • September 28, 2012
    ...the pipes is “part of the service that [defendants] provide[ ] and for which [they are] responsible” ( Haber v. Cross County Hosp., 37 N.Y.2d 888, 889, 378 N.Y.S.2d 369, 340 N.E.2d 734), we conclude that it is for the jury to determine whether “observance of [the internal policy] fell withi......
  • Pablo C., Matter of
    • United States
    • New York City Court
    • October 30, 1980
    ... ... Family Court, City of New York, ... Bronx County ... Oct. 30, 1980 ...         John F. Felton, New York City, for ... program of the New York Foundling Hospital ("N.Y.F.H.") The foster parents obtained a stay of this plan pending a ... ...
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT