v. Rodriguez
Decision Date | 12 September 2017 |
Docket Number | (AC 38839). |
Citation | 169 A.3d 292,176 Conn.App. 392 |
Court | Connecticut Court of Appeals |
Parties | A BETTER WAY WHOLESALE AUTOS, INC. v. Kiara RODRIGUEZ et al. |
Kenneth A. Votre, for the appellant (plaintiff).
Daniel S. Blinn, for the appellee (named defendant).
Proloy K. Das, with whom was Melissa A. Federico, for the appellee (defendant American Credit Acceptance, LLC).
Mullins, Beach and Harper, Js.
The plaintiff, A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. (A Better Way), appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying its application to vacate an arbitration award and granting the motions to confirm the arbitration award filed by the defendants, Kiara Rodriguez and American Credit Acceptance, LLC (finance company). A Better Way also appeals from the court's judgment modifying the arbitration award to include attorney's fees and costs to the finance company for its defense of the award in the Superior Court. On appeal, A Better Way claims that the trial court erred in (1) denying its application to vacate the award on the ground that the arbitrator's decision was beyond the scope of the parties' submission, and (2) ordering A Better Way to pay the attorney's fees and costs of the finance company in defending the arbitrator's award in the Superior Court.1 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as set forth by the trial court in its January 14, 2016 memorandum of decision and procedural history inform our review. "The underlying arbitration between the parties arises from the sale of a used 2006 Toyota Scion [vehicle] by A Better Way to ... Rodriguez. In this dispute, Rodriguez included [the finance company] as a defendant in its role as the assignee of the financing agreement in her retail installment sales contract with A Better Way.
(Citation omitted.)
2 (Citation omitted.)
A Better Way, specifically pursuant to General Statutes § 52–418,4 filed an application to vacate the portion of the award that ordered the finance company to return the vehicle to A Better Way on the grounds that "[t]he parties to the arbitration did not state that possession of the vehicle was at issue in any of the pleadings before the arbitrator ... [and] the submission did not include a determination of the ownership of the vehicle." A Better Way contended that the arbitrator, therefore, had exceeded his powers in determining ownership of the vehicle.5 Rodriguez and the finance company each filed a motion to confirm the award; the finance company moved pursuant to the Federal Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. § 9, and Rodriguez moved pursuant to General Statutes § 52–417. The finance company also requested that it be reimbursed $28,245.92 for the legal fees and costs it incurred in defending the award in the Superior Court in light of A Better Way's application to vacate. At the time of the hearing, the finance company also argued that it anticipated incurring an additional $3840 in fees and costs for the hearing.
In a January 14, 2016 memorandum of decision, the court granted the motions to confirm the award, and it denied the application to vacate. Specifically, the court determined that title and possession of the vehicle always were at issue, and that this was evidenced by Rodriguez' original letter in which she sought to rescind the entire agreement. The court, therefore, found no basis upon which to vacate the award. As to the finance company's request for the payment of the attorney's fees it incurred in defending the award, the court found that, pursuant to section 25 of the dealer agreement and General Statutes § 52–419(b),6 the finance company was entitled to such reimbursement. The court then ordered that A Better Way reimburse the finance company $621.92 in costs and expenses and $20,000 in attorney's fees within thirty days. This appeal followed.7 Additional facts will be set forth as necessary.
A Better Way claims that the trial court erred in denying its application to vacate the award on the ground that the arbitrator's decision was beyond the scope of the parties' submission in that the title to the vehicle was not within that submission. It further contends that the award should be considered in a way similar to the mosaic rule8 in a family matter and that it must be vacated in its entirety because the order that the finance company return the vehicle to A Better Way was outside the scope of the parties' submission. Accordingly, A Better Way argues, the court improperly denied its application to vacate the award. The finance company and Rodriguez argue that the court made a proper determination that the submission was unrestricted and that possession and title to the vehicle always was at issue, and, therefore, the arbitrator acted within his authority in determining who should take possession of the vehicle.9 We agree that the court properly denied A Better Way's application to vacate the award of the arbitrator.
We set forth the standard of review. (Citation omitted; emphasis added; internal quotation marks omitted.) LaFrance v. Lodmell , 322 Conn. 828, 850–51, 144 A.3d 373 (2016).
"When the scope of the submission is unrestricted, the resulting award is not subject to de novo review even for errors of law so long as the award conforms to the submission. ... Because we favor arbitration as a means of settling private disputes, we undertake judicial review of arbitration awards in a manner designed to minimize interference with an efficient and economical system of alternative dispute resolution. ...
Garrity v. McCaskey , 223 Conn. 1, 4–5, 612 A.2d 742 (1992). Accordingly, the factual findings of the arbitrator ... are not subject to judicial review. Burr Road Operating Co. II, LLC v. New England Health Care Employees Union, District 1199 , 316 Conn. 618, 638, 114 A.3d 144 (2015) ; see also Harty v. Cantor Fitzgerald & Co. , 275 Conn. 72, 80, 881 A.2d 139 (2005) ( )." (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Norwalk Police Union, Local 1727, Council 15, AFSCME, AFL–CIO v. Norwalk , 324 Conn. 618, 628–29, 153 A.3d 1280 (2017).
...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc
..., supra, 321 Conn. at 724–29, 138 A.3d 868 (discussing qualities of adequate briefing); see also A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Rodriguez , 176 Conn. App. 392, 407, 169 A.3d 292 (2017) (declining to review attorney's fee issue because of inadequate briefing), cert. denied, 327 Conn. ......
-
Freeman v. A Better Way Wholesale Autos, Inc.
... ... 655, 664-65, 893 A.2d 905, cert ... denied, 279 Conn. 911, 902 A.2d 1070 (2006). A trial court ... abuses its discretion by " seizing from the full panoply ... of relevant factors merely one factor to the exclusion and ... disregard of others." Rodriguez v. Ancona, 88 ... Conn.App. 193, 203, 868 A.2d 807 (2005) ... Turning ... to the task of determining reasonable supplemental fees in ... this case, the court considers the evidence of Blinn’s ... affidavit and billing records and Wareing’s testimony and ... ...
-
Fraccaroli v. Kusulas
... ... 764, 115 A.3d 1107 (2015)). Therefore, the question is ... whether there were unethical, unscrupulous, etc., qualities ... to the defendant's conduct, sufficient to warrant an ... award under CUTPA. See, e.g., A Better Way Wholesale ... Autos, Inc. v. Rodriguez , 176 Conn.App. 392, 419, 169 ... A.3d 292 (2017). The court has concluded that there was such ... behavior here ... First, ... there is no question that the defendant is in the ... construction business, such that the threshold for CUTPA--an ... ...
-
Derose v. Jason Roberts, Inc.
... ... the claims of laches and violations of public policy, the ... court determined the matter in accordance with the ... arbitrator’s finding that the delay in the arbitration ... was caused by the Defendants. See A Better Way ... Wholesale Autos, Inc. v. Rodriguez, 176 Conn.App. 392, ... 401, 169 A.3d 292 (2017) (in an unrestricted submission ... " the factual findings of the arbitrator ... are not ... subject to judicial review"). In this case, the ... defendants had refused to answer the plaintiff’s brief that ... was filed ... ...